Who writes your jokes Jack?
Current Affairs
-
oldbluefox
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12533
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
-
Jack Staff
- First Officer

- Posts: 1656
- Joined: September 2016
Re: Current Affairs
Nick Timothy
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.
-
oldbluefox
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12533
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
Re: Current Affairs
Far from being terrified of Tiny Tim I believe the Tories would see it as the final ignominy to take his seat away from him.
Anyone any ideas why Tiny Tim has taken to talking like a Dalek? I thought Clegg was bad but this fella takes the biscuit.
Anyone any ideas why Tiny Tim has taken to talking like a Dalek? I thought Clegg was bad but this fella takes the biscuit.
I was taught to be cautious
-
Manoverboard
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 13014
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Dorset
Re: Current Affairs
... is he practicing to be the ' Speaking Clock ' in his new career come June the 9th ? 
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being
-
qbman1
- Captain

- Posts: 12153
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Current Affairs
No, they have Diane Abbot lined up for that job.....
"at the fifteenth stroke, it will be seventeen eighty four and ninety seven seconds"
"at the fifteenth stroke, it will be seventeen eighty four and ninety seven seconds"
-
screwy
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 3033
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Lancashire
Re: Current Affairs
qbman1 wrote: 19 May 2017, 09:34No, they have Diane Abbot lined up for that job.....
"at the fifteenth stroke, it will be seventeen eighty four and ninety seven seconds"
Mel
-
Jack Staff
- First Officer

- Posts: 1656
- Joined: September 2016
Re: Current Affairs
Strong and stable, strong and stable, strong and stable, strong and stableoldbluefox wrote: 19 May 2017, 08:40Far from being terrified of Tiny Tim I believe the Tories would see it as the final ignominy to take his seat away from him.
Anyone any ideas why Tiny Tim has taken to talking like a Dalek? I thought Clegg was bad but this fella takes the biscuit.
Who talks like a Dalek?
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17027
- Joined: February 2013
Re: Current Affairs
Labour had a good choice of leaders and look what they went for!Jack Staff wrote: 18 May 2017, 19:46Actually you are spot on. Have you seen the resources the Tory's are pumping in to his specific seat? (and Clegg's). They are terrified of him and are pulling out all the stops to try and nail him. They may even succeed.Mervyn and Trish wrote: 18 May 2017, 19:32My point is that as leader of the opposition, even if in his wildest dreams he could achieve that, he would not have the power to impose a second referendum nor any of the other cloud cuckoo policies he's putting forward. In fact the way he's going he'll be lucky to keep his seat. He'd be better off pitching for chairman of his local parish council.
However, that may be a bad idea. When he was picked as party leader they only had a choice of eight. If he goes on June 8th the LibDems may have a far wider choice of sucessors, so the Tory's should perhaps be careful of what they wish for.
I would have said that is dirty tricks by the Tory's and should be stopped, except when it comes to Maidenhead, where I think it is a great idea.
Personally my money is on TM for this election and she needs more than a knife edge majority to convince the EU they can't treat her with the contempt they did Call-Me-Dave. But we should have an effective opposition. We don't have it at the moment and never will have with Jezzer and Tiny Tim in charge.
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 19 May 2017, 13:17, edited 1 time in total.
-
Jack Staff
- First Officer

- Posts: 1656
- Joined: September 2016
Re: Current Affairs
At least he was democratically elected, unlike Mayhem (if we must do the silly names).Mervyn and Trish wrote: 19 May 2017, 13:16
Labour had a good choice of leaders and look what they went for!
You really like to stick your neck out don't you Merv? I think we can safely assume Conservatives will win this one.
The EU don't care about a majority. The 27 of them will treat the leader of the UK exactly as they should, hopefully ignoring the insults and accusations thrown at them by the current and previous leaders of the UK.Mervyn and Trish wrote: 19 May 2017, 13:16and she needs more than a knife edge majority to convince the EU they can't treat her with the contempt they did Call-Me-Dave.
We are not electing a president as Maybot wants you to think. It is the policies that matter.Mervyn and Trish wrote: 19 May 2017, 13:16We don't have it at the moment and never will have with Jezzer and Tiny Tim in charge.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17027
- Joined: February 2013
Re: Current Affairs
Just one thing to say. Gordon Brown
-
Jack Staff
- First Officer

- Posts: 1656
- Joined: September 2016
Re: Current Affairs
Last edited by Jack Staff on 19 May 2017, 13:46, edited 1 time in total.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17027
- Joined: February 2013
Re: Current Affairs
Shame he didn't save any money for a rainy day.
-
Jack Staff
- First Officer

- Posts: 1656
- Joined: September 2016
Re: Current Affairs
I thought he flogged off all our gold reserves.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.
-
barney
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 5852
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Instow Devon
Re: Current Affairs
Good effort Jack. Well done!
A bold defence of the indefensible.
I admire your indefagability.
Make a sentence - Horse Dead A Flogging
It's over mate. The UK is leaving the EU in 2019, irrespective of the deal done.
Personally, I'd like as much negotiation done in public but they won't go for that.
I'd like the UK to start with a proposal of zero tariffs both ways.
The EU can then respond to what they think any tariffs should be and the ball starts rolling from there.
Then it is what it is, and we all (they and us) have to live with it.
It's not a DIVORCE because we were never married.
We are simply leaving a 'club' that we no longer wish to belong to.
What's so difficult about that?
Why all this EU talk of punishments and over reacting to anything coming from our side.
A story in the Guardian yesterday focussed on Barnier asking the EU Commissioners how they would like to proceed if the UK refused to stump up the 100billion 'divorce bill'
Would they prefer making larger contributions themselves OR reign in the spending.
The answer was neither, the UK must be made to pay.
And they wonder why we are leaving
A bold defence of the indefensible.
I admire your indefagability.
Make a sentence - Horse Dead A Flogging
It's over mate. The UK is leaving the EU in 2019, irrespective of the deal done.
Personally, I'd like as much negotiation done in public but they won't go for that.
I'd like the UK to start with a proposal of zero tariffs both ways.
The EU can then respond to what they think any tariffs should be and the ball starts rolling from there.
Then it is what it is, and we all (they and us) have to live with it.
It's not a DIVORCE because we were never married.
We are simply leaving a 'club' that we no longer wish to belong to.
What's so difficult about that?
Why all this EU talk of punishments and over reacting to anything coming from our side.
A story in the Guardian yesterday focussed on Barnier asking the EU Commissioners how they would like to proceed if the UK refused to stump up the 100billion 'divorce bill'
Would they prefer making larger contributions themselves OR reign in the spending.
The answer was neither, the UK must be made to pay.
And they wonder why we are leaving
Last edited by barney on 19 May 2017, 14:33, edited 1 time in total.
Free and Accepted
-
Stephen
Topic author - Commodore

- Posts: 17764
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)
Re: Current Affairs
barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32Good effort Jack. Well done!
A bold defence of the indefensible.
I admire your indefagability.
Make a sentence - Horse Dead A Flogging
It's over mate. The UK is leaving the EU in 2019, irrespective of the deal done.
Personally, I'd like as much negotiation done in public but they won't go for that.
I'd like the UK to start with a proposal of zero tariffs both ways.
The EU can then respond to what they think any tariffs should be and the ball starts rolling from there.
Then it is what it is, and we all (they and us) have to live with it.
It's not a DIVORCE because we were never married.
We are simply leaving a 'club' that we no longer wish to belong to.
What's so difficult about that?
Why all this EU talk of punishments and over reacting to anything coming from our side.
A story in the Guardian yesterday focussed on Barnier asking the EU Commissioners how they would like to proceed if the UK refused to stump up the 100billion 'divorce bill'
Would they prefer making larger contributions themselves OR reign in the spending.
The answer was neither, the UK must be made to pay.
And they wonder why we are leaving![]()
Good luck with that one.
As Winnie would say
Last edited by Stephen on 19 May 2017, 16:05, edited 1 time in total.
-
Jack Staff
- First Officer

- Posts: 1656
- Joined: September 2016
Re: Current Affairs
Thank you.barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32Good effort Jack. Well done!
A bold defence of the indefensible.
I admire your indefagability.
Maybe, maybe not.barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32Make a sentence - Horse Dead A Flogging
It's over mate. The UK is leaving the EU in 2019, irrespective of the deal done.
The UK government won't, but the EU will. So what is happening will not appear on the BBC and Daily Mail. Brexiters will be the only ones not to know what is going on. Same as now really.barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32Personally, I'd like as much negotiation done in public but they won't go for that.
barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32I'd like the UK to start with a proposal of zero tariffs both ways.
The EU will tell us what the deal is.barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32The EU can then respond to what they think any tariffs should be and the ball starts rolling from there.
Yes we will. We will have to live with what they tell us.barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32Then it is what it is, and we all (they and us) have to live with it.
It was a legal contract, between two parties. Pretty much like a marriage. And any way, have you tried to get out of a gym membership? You can't just walk away.barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32It's not a DIVORCE because we were never married.
We are simply leaving a 'club' that we no longer wish to belong to.
What's so difficult about that?
We (supposedly) are going to leave. Them telling us how it is going to be is not punishment, simply reality.barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32Why all this EU talk of punishments and over reacting to anything coming from our side.
And we will. We said we would when we entered into the deal. We have no choice.barney wrote: 19 May 2017, 14:32A story in the Guardian yesterday focussed on Barnier asking the EU Commissioners how they would like to proceed if the UK refused to stump up the 100billion 'divorce bill'
Would they prefer making larger contributions themselves OR reign in the spending.
The answer was neither, the UK must be made to pay.
Yes, they do. In exactly the same way I do. Why on earth would anyone want to make themselves poorer voluntarily?
"We hope to see a Europe where men of every country will think of being a European as of belonging to their native land, and ... wherever they go in this wide domain, will truly feel 'here I am at home'" - Winston Churchill, a founding father of the EU.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.
-
CaroleF
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 2184
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Hampshire
Re: Current Affairs
We may be geographically part of Europe but we are not Europeans in the same way that mainland Europe considers themselves to be. Of course there are obviously those who consider themselves to be Europeans - that is their right - but I bet the majority of those in these islands consider themselves to be either English, Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish or British. Jack is obviously a European but do not make the mistake that the EU seem to be making in thinking the vast majority of us are the same. I voted to join the European Common Market back in the 1970s but I did not vote to join a United States of Europe which is where the vast majority of the EU seem to want to be. I am a great fan of Winston Churchill but even the passage quoted above does not mean he was thinking of a United States of Europe.
-
Jack Staff
- First Officer

- Posts: 1656
- Joined: September 2016
Re: Current Affairs
"We must build a kind of United States of Europe."CaroleF wrote: 20 May 2017, 16:01We may be geographically part of Europe but we are not Europeans in the same way that mainland Europe considers themselves to be. Of course there are obviously those who consider themselves to be Europeans - that is their right - but I bet the majority of those in these islands consider themselves to be either English, Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish or British. Jack is obviously a European but do not make the mistake that the EU seem to be making in thinking the vast majority of us are the same. I voted to join the European Common Market back in the 1970s but I did not vote to join a United States of Europe which is where the vast majority of the EU seem to want to be. I am a great fan of Winston Churchill but even the passage quoted above does not mean he was thinking of a United States of Europe.
Mr Winston Churchill speaking in Zurich
I9th September 1946.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17027
- Joined: February 2013
Re: Current Affairs
So even Churchill can be wrong.
-
Stephen
Topic author - Commodore

- Posts: 17764
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)
-
Manoverboard
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 13014
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Dorset
Re: Current Affairs
... a ' kind of ' is quite likely but did Winston really envisage and desire a version that would essentially be controlled by Germany.
I doubt it.
I doubt it.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17027
- Joined: February 2013
Re: Current Affairs
I hear he wasn't Germany's greatest fan.
-
Jack Staff
- First Officer

- Posts: 1656
- Joined: September 2016
Re: Current Affairs
No, he thought we British had the gumption to stand our corner rather than just giving them the continent as we are going to now.Manoverboard wrote: 20 May 2017, 18:14... a ' kind of ' is quite likely but did Winston really envisage and desire a version that would essentially be controlled by Germany.
I doubt it.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17027
- Joined: February 2013
Re: Current Affairs
And you think we could stop that if we stayed in? Not according to Dave "Chamberlain " Cameron's piece of paper
-
Jack Staff
- First Officer

- Posts: 1656
- Joined: September 2016
Re: Current Affairs
That is the point of the EU. Instead we are just flouncing off like a spoilt child.Mervyn and Trish wrote: 20 May 2017, 18:26And you think we could stop that if we stayed in? Not according to Dave "Chamberlain " Cameron's piece of paper
I never trusted Cameron anyway, he's the one who created all this mess, purely to keep the Conservative together.
What ever happened to country before party?
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.