King Charles lll Coronation

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

I don't remember the 1953 Coronation at all but I remember seeing footage of that amazing lady since.

During today's procession I could see what they mean about that gold coach. It was jiggling about horribly. Hope it has sick bags!

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10929
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by david63 »

oldbluefox wrote: 06 May 2023, 16:53
going for a steak pasty at Greggs with Harry before he sets off home
Too late - apparently Meghan told him go straight back after the ceremony and he was seen in a car going to Heathrow

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12524
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by oldbluefox »

david63 wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:28
oldbluefox wrote: 06 May 2023, 16:53
going for a steak pasty at Greggs with Harry before he sets off home
Too late - apparently Meghan told him go straight back after the ceremony and he was seen in a car going to Heathrow
Better let Stephen know although I think it was his turn to pay.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

I couldn't help thinking that if they'd chosen a different path Harry and Meghan could have been in the front row in the Abbey and on the balcony at the Palace. But she they made another choice and he was left eating an airline meal with a plastic knife and fork on his lonely way home while the rest of the family enjoyed a good lunch celebrating a historic day.

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Onelife »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 16:36
The latest poll I can find says 45% of the population want the Monarchy abolished. That is already a minority. The picture for the republicans becomes even worse if you consider the potential replacement with an elected head of state because those 45% wouldn't agree who it should be.

For simplicity let's assume there were only two candidates, from the left and right of politics. Let's call them Tony and Boris and, again for simplicity, assume they evenly divided the republican vote.

So that means the overall vote is King Charles 55%, President Tony 22.5% and President Boris 22.5%.

So whichever way it went we would end up with a President 77.5% of the population didn't want.

No thanks.
I hadn’t realised it was so many wishing to see the Monarchy abolished, but I’m not surprised. The percentages that you are trying to show are meaningless because until such time that the Monarchy is removed our present system of Governance will continue along the same old tramlines…one broken tram following the other.

Only when the Monarchy is removed will the people of our country have the right to decide which political system best suits and represents their aspirations and futures, one, which one would hope, is far removed from that of a political system that remains trapped in the archives of medieval history.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Ray Scully wrote: 06 May 2023, 15:37
It appears that my post re SCREWY Thank heavens for Penny. Can’t imagine what it would have been like if Starmers gobby sidekick Rayner been doing it.

I believe Diane Abbott turned up late,apparently she thought it was a wedding. Has been pulled please confirm
NO posts of yours, Ray, have been pulled, This I can confirm ... OL was lying :angel:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being


Ray Scully
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2069
Joined: January 2013
Location: Lancashire

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Ray Scully »

Manoverboard wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:47
Ray Scully wrote: 06 May 2023, 15:37
It appears that my post re SCREWY Thank heavens for Penny. Can’t imagine what it would have been like if Starmers gobby sidekick Rayner been doing it.

I believe Diane Abbott turned up late,apparently she thought it was a wedding. Has been pulled please confirm
NO posts of yours, Ray, have been pulled, This I can confirm ... OL was lying :angel:
Thanks Moby, could be my end, logging on and moving pages takes me an eternity on the site. Presumably OL has now been banned ;)
Last edited by Ray Scully on 06 May 2023, 17:56, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Onelife »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:35
I couldn't help thinking that if they'd chosen a different path Harry and Meghan could have been in the front row in the Abbey and on the balcony at the Palace. But she they made another choice and he was left eating an airline meal with a plastic knife and fork on his lonely way home while the rest of the family enjoyed a good lunch celebrating a historic day.
Nothing like a slice of quiche and salad to wet the appetite. Yummy! Yummy! I doubt many will be requesting doggy bags after that serving. But credit due as he is settings a good example of what healthy living is all about …. he’ll no doubt be tucking into fillet steak for supper. :thumbup:

Hope Archie’s Birthday is going well…excellent parenting having a dad who wasn’t going to miss his son’s Birthday no matter his other commitment. :clap:

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Onelife »

Ray Scully wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:54
Manoverboard wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:47
Ray Scully wrote: 06 May 2023, 15:37
It appears that my post re SCREWY Thank heavens for Penny. Can’t imagine what it would have been like if Starmers gobby sidekick Rayner been doing it.

I believe Diane Abbott turned up late,apparently she thought it was a wedding. Has been pulled please confirm
NO posts of yours, Ray, have been pulled, This I can confirm ... OL was lying :angel:
Thanks Moby, could be my end, logging on and moving pages takes me an eternity on the site. Presumably OL has now been banned ;)
Keep this up Ray and you’ll see where Mobs loyalties really lie :thumbup: :D


Ray Scully
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2069
Joined: January 2013
Location: Lancashire

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Ray Scully »

Onelife wrote: 06 May 2023, 18:00
Ray Scully wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:54
Manoverboard wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:47

NO posts of yours, Ray, have been pulled, This I can confirm ... OL was lying :angel:
Thanks Moby, could be my end, logging on and moving pages takes me an eternity on the site. Presumably OL has now been banned ;)
Keep this up Ray and you’ll see where Mobs loyalties really lie :thumbup: :D
OL only joking about banning you, stripping you of your rank would be enough to appease me ;)

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

I have to say thank goodness the Queen lived such a long life.

If she'd passed away in the previous four years, instead of the elegant and dignified Penny carrying the sword we'd have had Jacob Rees-Mogg.

Dodged a bullet there.
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 06 May 2023, 18:12, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Onelife wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:38
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 16:36
The latest poll I can find says 45% of the population want the Monarchy abolished. That is already a minority. The picture for the republicans becomes even worse if you consider the potential replacement with an elected head of state because those 45% wouldn't agree who it should be.

For simplicity let's assume there were only two candidates, from the left and right of politics. Let's call them Tony and Boris and, again for simplicity, assume they evenly divided the republican vote.

So that means the overall vote is King Charles 55%, President Tony 22.5% and President Boris 22.5%.

So whichever way it went we would end up with a President 77.5% of the population didn't want.

No thanks.
I hadn’t realised it was so many wishing to see the Monarchy abolished, but I’m not surprised. The percentages that you are trying to show are meaningless because until such time that the Monarchy is removed our present system of Governance will continue along the same old tramlines…one broken tram following the other.

Only when the Monarchy is removed will the people of our country have the right to decide which political system best suits and represents their aspirations and futures, one, which one would hope, is far removed from that of a political system that remains trapped in the archives of medieval history.
You need have no fears OL. Under the figures quoted there is 0% chance of the Monarchy being abolished in my lifetime or yours. My advice would be to address your campaign towards something achievable.


Ray Scully
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2069
Joined: January 2013
Location: Lancashire

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Ray Scully »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 18:12
I have to say thank goodness the Queen lived such a long life.

If she'd passed away in the previous four years, instead of the elegant and dignified Penny carrying the sword we'd have had Jacob Rees-Mogg.

Dodged a bullet there.
:clap: :clap: :clap: :lol: :lol:

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Onelife »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 18:12
I have to say thank goodness the Queen lived such a long life.

If she'd passed away in the previous four years, instead of the elegant and dignified Penny carrying the sword we'd have had Jacob Rees-Mogg.

Dodged a bullet there.
She can carry my weapon any day...Sorry Jan it just slipped out :oops: :o :wave:

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Onelife »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 18:25
Onelife wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:38
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 16:36
The latest poll I can find says 45% of the population want the Monarchy abolished. That is already a minority. The picture for the republicans becomes even worse if you consider the potential replacement with an elected head of state because those 45% wouldn't agree who it should be.

For simplicity let's assume there were only two candidates, from the left and right of politics. Let's call them Tony and Boris and, again for simplicity, assume they evenly divided the republican vote.

So that means the overall vote is King Charles 55%, President Tony 22.5% and President Boris 22.5%.

So whichever way it went we would end up with a President 77.5% of the population didn't want.

No thanks.
I hadn’t realised it was so many wishing to see the Monarchy abolished, but I’m not surprised. The percentages that you are trying to show are meaningless because until such time that the Monarchy is removed our present system of Governance will continue along the same old tramlines…one broken tram following the other.

Only when the Monarchy is removed will the people of our country have the right to decide which political system best suits and represents their aspirations and futures, one, which one would hope, is far removed from that of a political system that remains trapped in the archives of medieval history.
You need have no fears OL. Under the figures quoted there is 0% chance of the Monarchy being abolished in my lifetime or yours. My advice would be to address your campaign towards something achievable.
I was thinking of our children and their children’s futures :thumbup: :)

User avatar

Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17750
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Stephen »

oldbluefox wrote: 06 May 2023, 16:53
Are you going for a steak pasty at Greggs with Harry before he sets off home,Stephen? :P

Who?

User avatar

Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17750
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Stephen »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:35
I couldn't help thinking that if they'd chosen a different path Harry and Meghan could have been in the front row in the Abbey and on the balcony at the Palace. But she they made another choice and he was left eating an airline meal with a plastic knife and fork on his lonely way home while the rest of the family enjoyed a good lunch celebrating a historic day.

A sad state of affairs really. But they made they’re bed….

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Onelife »

Stephen wrote: 06 May 2023, 18:48
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:35
I couldn't help thinking that if they'd chosen a different path Harry and Meghan could have been in the front row in the Abbey and on the balcony at the Palace. But she they made another choice and he was left eating an airline meal with a plastic knife and fork on his lonely way home while the rest of the family enjoyed a good lunch celebrating a historic day.

A sad state of affairs really. But they made they’re bed….
There are some like me who think their bed was made for them…but I'll leave that for another day.
Last edited by Onelife on 06 May 2023, 19:09, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by towny44 »

Onelife wrote: 06 May 2023, 17:38
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 16:36
The latest poll I can find says 45% of the population want the Monarchy abolished. That is already a minority. The picture for the republicans becomes even worse if you consider the potential replacement with an elected head of state because those 45% wouldn't agree who it should be.

For simplicity let's assume there were only two candidates, from the left and right of politics. Let's call them Tony and Boris and, again for simplicity, assume they evenly divided the republican vote.

So that means the overall vote is King Charles 55%, President Tony 22.5% and President Boris 22.5%.

So whichever way it went we would end up with a President 77.5% of the population didn't want.

No thanks.
I hadn’t realised it was so many wishing to see the Monarchy abolished, but I’m not surprised. The percentages that you are trying to show are meaningless because until such time that the Monarchy is removed our present system of Governance will continue along the same old tramlines…one broken tram following the other.

Only when the Monarchy is removed will the people of our country have the right to decide which political system best suits and represents their aspirations and futures, one, which one would hope, is far removed from that of a political system that remains trapped in the archives of medieval history.
I believe Merv got it wrong, I think the 45% wanting the monarchy abolished was from a poll of the under 25s. Since we know that with age comes wisdom, then by their 40s most of these will be fervent monarchies.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

You're probably right. But it's still a minority, and one that hasn't a clue what they want to replace it.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

FB_IMG_1683412351993.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar

Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17750
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Stephen »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 06 May 2023, 23:15
You're probably right. But it's still a minority, and one that hasn't a clue what they want to replace it.

They don’t even know what sex they want to be let alone what they want in place of the monarchy.
Last edited by Stephen on 07 May 2023, 07:28, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar

Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17750
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Stephen »

It was a good test run for William yesterday.

Harry didn’t hang around. Straight to Heathrow and back to Los Angeles directly after the ceremony finished.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12524
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Hopefully it will be the last time we see him at a Royal event.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: King Charles lll Coronation

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

He'll be back home when his fame runs out and Meghan dumps him. I'll give it three years max.
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 07 May 2023, 08:35, edited 2 times in total.

Return to “General Chat”