Silly Season Again

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Well, I don't think that polar bears should pay taxes :angel:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being


Lollie
Third Officer
Third Officer
Posts: 157
Joined: February 2013
Location: Purley, Surrey

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by Lollie »

Apparently they are turning their attention to hairdryers and the like next, those with thick, long hair best stock up asap!


Ray Scully
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2069
Joined: January 2013
Location: Lancashire

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by Ray Scully »

Irrespective of individual views of global warming. It is a fact that fossil fuels are a finite resource. Therefore have we all not an obligation to use them sparingly?

Ray

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17028
Joined: February 2013

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

I would agree Ray that there are good reasons for taking care over our use of fossil fuels, but not the stupid blind panic which, for example, sees us closing coal fired power stations, because the EU says so, before we have replacements built, resulting in the risk of our lights going out like some third world country. Or imposing "green" taxes, which mean some people on low incomes cannot afford to heat their homes. Or introducing technology which is expensive but not fully developed, such as the LED bulbs which I paid £8 each for last August. I bought five, with a claimed life of 25 years. I have one left after 1 year!

User avatar

Topic author
david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10936
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by david63 »

Mervyn and Trish wrote:
I would agree Ray that there are good reasons for taking care over our use of fossil fuels, but not the stupid blind panic which, for example, sees us closing coal fired power stations, because the EU says so, before we have replacements built, resulting in the risk of our lights going out like some third world country. Or imposing "green" taxes, which mean some people on low incomes cannot afford to heat their homes. Or introducing technology which is expensive but not fully developed, such as the LED bulbs which I paid £8 each for last August. I bought five, with a claimed life of 25 years. I have one left after 1 year!
... and they now only cost £2.50

User avatar

johnds
Second Officer
Second Officer
Posts: 331
Joined: January 2013
Location: Chorley

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by johnds »

Lollie wrote:
Apparently they are turning their attention to hairdryers and the like next,
Apparently Vacuum cleaners today - hair dryers next then electric kettles and toasters according to the beeb

Now I know it's 55 years since I studied physics (probably not called that now) but surely to heat a fixed volume of water from say 20c to 100c takes a fixed amount of power which let's measure in KwH. So 2000 KW takes say one minute but 1000 KW takes 2 minutes (or perhaps slightly longer allowing for heat dissipation as it warms up) How does that save power ?
John

User avatar

Topic author
david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10936
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by david63 »

johnds wrote:
Now I know it's 55 years since I studied physics (probably not called that now) but surely to heat a fixed volume of water from say 20c to 100c takes a fixed amount of power which let's measure in KwH. So 2000 KW takes say one minute but 1000 KW takes 2 minutes (or perhaps slightly longer allowing for heat dissipation as it warms up) How does that save power ?
That is probably true when you look at traditional methods but these days there are so many "new" technologies about that you can probably heat water using less energy in the same amount of time.

The trouble with all of this is that it comes at a price and it is us, Joe Public, who will have to foot the bill at the end of the day.

User avatar

johnds
Second Officer
Second Officer
Posts: 331
Joined: January 2013
Location: Chorley

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by johnds »

David

I don't see how you can raise say 100ml of water from 20c to 100c with any less energy whatever you use.

John
John

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Perhaps their point is that it only needs to be 80 or 90 degrees rather than 100 :?
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9669
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by towny44 »

Manoverboard wrote:
Perhaps their point is that it only needs to be 80 or 90 degrees rather than 100 :?
Well that's easy to achieve just have the thermostat switch set lower, of course your tea will then taste awful but which EU politician cares.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Topic author
david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10936
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by david63 »

johnds wrote:
David

I don't see how you can raise say 100ml of water from 20c to 100c with any less energy whatever you use.

John
I believe that induction heating is more efficient and uses less energy - although how practical it would be to make a cup of tea is probably debatable - but I would guess that there will be developments with such technologies over the next few years.


Quizzical Bob
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3951
Joined: January 2013

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by Quizzical Bob »

johnds wrote:
David

I don't see how you can raise say 100ml of water from 20c to 100c with any less energy whatever you use.

John
You can't, and the slower you do it the more energy you waste.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by Manoverboard »

towny44 wrote:
Manoverboard wrote:
Perhaps their point is that it only needs to be 80 or 90 degrees rather than 100 :?
Well that's easy to achieve just have the thermostat switch set lower, of course your tea will then taste awful but which EU politician cares.
No good for tea but 80 degrees is just fine for making coffee ... which will, no doubt, be their 2020 directive :lol:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being


Ray Scully
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2069
Joined: January 2013
Location: Lancashire

Re: Silly Season Again

Unread post by Ray Scully »

:wave: Luddites :wave: ;)

Return to “General Chat”