So what?

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Topic author
anneed
Second Officer
Second Officer
Posts: 216
Joined: February 2013

So what?

Unread post by anneed »

Is it just me or have others noticed a new speech trend whereby people begin with the word 'So' when answering questions? Now that I've become aware of it I seem to hear it all the time. Where has this come from? It's as annoying as people using an upward inflection turning every statement into a question.

So (see what I did there?) what quirks of language get on your nerves? (And the overuse of the word 'like' is a given.)

User avatar

qbman1
Captain
Captain
Posts: 12153
Joined: January 2013
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: So what?

Unread post by qbman1 »

So, like, what winds me up is the constant use of "I mean" often about three times a sentence like.

I mean, if you don't mean it, why say it ?!

User avatar

Silver_Shiney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 6400
Joined: January 2013
Location: Bradley Stoke

Re: So what?

Unread post by Silver_Shiney »

My son's been doing this "so" business ever since he moved out to Florida a few years ago. It's infuriating, but not as bad (imo) as the diminutives of should've, would've etc being pronounced "should of", "would of"
Alan

Q-CC-KOS
Q-CC-TBM

User avatar

qbman1
Captain
Captain
Posts: 12153
Joined: January 2013
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: So what?

Unread post by qbman1 »

Silver_Shiney wrote:
My son's been doing this "so" business ever since he moved out to Florida a few years ago. It's infuriating, but not as bad (imo) as the diminutives of should've, would've etc being pronounced "should of", "would of"
Even worse when they are written like that !!


Boris+
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3367
Joined: February 2013

Re: So what?

Unread post by Boris+ »

No, Anne, It's not just you - it's becoming more and more commonly used.

However, as ever the rebel - I do my best to not use 'so' to start a sentence, similarly I don't use 'should of' or 'could of'.

Meanwhile, I'm going to continue to keep calm and pack!

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12533
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: So what?

Unread post by oldbluefox »

The use of the word 'less' when it should actually be 'fewer' really grates especially when it is used by reporters and news correspondents who are always quick to point out how many degrees they have and how they are doing the rest of us a favour. It's not rocket science to know the difference, just lazy journalism from those who should know better.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17025
Joined: February 2013

Re: So what?

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

At least "so" is gramatically okay, if irritating. "Should of" is just plain nonsense. What do they think it means? Is the present tense "I of", "you of" etc? And in the past "I ovved"?

Another one that annoys me is "for free" when what they mean is simply "free". "Children get in for free". "Buy one, get another for free". All cobblers.

And a friend of mine has what I think is the best. The one before programmes where they say "contains strong language" when he says they actually mean "contains weak vocabulary"

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12533
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: So what?

Unread post by oldbluefox »

............................................ and since when did thank and you become one word?
I suppose we should be grateful to see it anyway considering that for many the phrase does not exist!!!
I was taught to be cautious


anniec
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 669
Joined: December 2014

Re: So what?

Unread post by anniec »

Mervyn and Trish wrote:
At least "so" is gramatically okay, if irritating. "Should of" is just plain nonsense. What do they think it means? Is the present tense "I of", "you of" etc? And in the past "I ovved"?

Another one that annoys me is "for free" when what they mean is simply "free". "Children get in for free". "Buy one, get another for free". All cobblers.

And a friend of mine has what I think is the best. The one before programmes where they say "contains strong language" when he says they actually mean "contains weak vocabulary"
Hooray! I HATE 'for free', now even used by the Beeb, and by serious journalists too.

I give you 'effected' instead of 'affected' (or vice versa).

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17025
Joined: February 2013

Re: So what?

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Once upon the time the Beeb used to lead standards now they follow the pack.

Not a wrong word or usage, but a trendy and irritating pronunciation. Homage. It always used to be hom-ij. Now it's often hom-arj, with a very soft j.

I'm sure the trendies will say it's a French word and therefore we should use the French pronunciation. In which case we should also say Par-ee, not Par-is. And Fr-ons, not Fr-ar-ns.

There is, by the way, a useful on line oral Cambridge dictionary where you can look up words and hear them pronounced correctly. I did check this one and no, it isn't me!

So......

User avatar

qbman1
Captain
Captain
Posts: 12153
Joined: January 2013
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: So what?

Unread post by qbman1 »

Mervyn and Trish wrote:
Once upon the time the Beeb used to lead standards now they follow the pack.

Not a wrong word or usage, but a trendy and irritating pronunciation. Homage. It always used to be hom-ij. Now it's often hom-arj, with a very soft j.

I'm sure the trendies will say it's a French word and therefore we should use the French pronunciation. In which case we should also say Par-ee, not Par-is. And Fr-ons, not Fr-ar-ns.

There is, by the way, a useful on line oral Cambridge dictionary where you can look up words and hear them pronounced correctly. I did check this one and no, it isn't me!

So......
I'm sure Moorlands Radio leads the way now !!


Ranchi
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 919
Joined: September 2014

Re: So what?

Unread post by Ranchi »

I think we have to blame Joni Mitchell for 'for free'.
'Mains' on a menu really irritates me. As a farm its OK.
I also think there is only one Baltic Sea. (Oops!)
Although not grammatical, I get annoyed at the incorrect use of chemical symbols (& symbols for measurements) by newspapers, TV companies & firms that should know better.
One company which caused a problem was Berghaus. They brought out a range of clothing & sacks with the H2O symbol but with a superscripted '2' (rather than the subscripted number). Due to Berghaus being such an aspirational brand with young people, superscripted numbers became common (presumably with an increasing number of students losing marks in exams). Berghaus did change the labelling of their H2O range fairly quickly.
Last edited by Ranchi on 19 Feb 2016, 16:20, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17025
Joined: February 2013

Re: So what?

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

qbman1 wrote:
Mervyn and Trish wrote:
Once upon the time the Beeb used to lead standards now they follow the pack.

Not a wrong word or usage, but a trendy and irritating pronunciation. Homage. It always used to be hom-ij. Now it's often hom-arj, with a very soft j.

I'm sure the trendies will say it's a French word and therefore we should use the French pronunciation. In which case we should also say Par-ee, not Par-is. And Fr-ons, not Fr-ar-ns.

There is, by the way, a useful on line oral Cambridge dictionary where you can look up words and hear them pronounced correctly. I did check this one and no, it isn't me!

So......
I'm sure Moorlands Radio leads the way now !!
We sure do. Well sometimes. In our little world.

The Beeb went down hill round about the time I left. Just saying.....

User avatar

qbman1
Captain
Captain
Posts: 12153
Joined: January 2013
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: So what?

Unread post by qbman1 »

Well, it would of, wouldn't it !

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17025
Joined: February 2013

Re: So what?

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

It did of.......


anniec
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 669
Joined: December 2014

Re: So what?

Unread post by anniec »

Mervyn and Trish wrote:
Once upon the time the Beeb used to lead standards now they follow the pack.

Not a wrong word or usage, but a trendy and irritating pronunciation. Homage. It always used to be hom-ij. Now it's often hom-arj, with a very soft j.

I'm sure the trendies will say it's a French word and therefore we should use the French pronunciation. In which case we should also say Par-ee, not Par-is. And Fr-ons, not Fr-ar-ns.

There is, by the way, a useful on line oral Cambridge dictionary where you can look up words and hear them pronounced correctly. I did check this one and no, it isn't me!

So......
How strange. A friend and I were discussing the new 'improved' Frenchified pronunciation of homage only a couple of days ago. We even made the point about Paree.

How about subsidence, which used to be subsid-ence and now seems to be subside-ence (the middle bit now rhyming with ride)?

User avatar

Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17762
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: So what?

Unread post by Stephen »

I don't know where they get it from :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLuEY6jN6gY

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12533
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: So what?

Unread post by oldbluefox »

We used to go to the pictires or the cinema. Nowadays we have to go to the movies because the media says so. What's wrong with our own language?
I was taught to be cautious


Quizzical Bob
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3951
Joined: January 2013

Re: So what?

Unread post by Quizzical Bob »

anniec wrote:
Mervyn and Trish wrote:
Once upon the time the Beeb used to lead standards now they follow the pack.

Not a wrong word or usage, but a trendy and irritating pronunciation. Homage. It always used to be hom-ij. Now it's often hom-arj, with a very soft j.

I'm sure the trendies will say it's a French word and therefore we should use the French pronunciation. In which case we should also say Par-ee, not Par-is. And Fr-ons, not Fr-ar-ns.

There is, by the way, a useful on line oral Cambridge dictionary where you can look up words and hear them pronounced correctly. I did check this one and no, it isn't me!

So......
How strange. A friend and I were discussing the new 'improved' Frenchified pronunciation of homage only a couple of days ago. We even made the point about Paree.

How about subsidence, which used to be subsid-ence and now seems to be subside-ence (the middle bit now rhyming with ride)?
If you listen to Kenneth Williams in Round the Horne he always made a point of Saint 'omarge'.


anniec
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 669
Joined: December 2014

Re: So what?

Unread post by anniec »

Another irritation: the use of the word 'community' - the 'golfing community', the 'community is in shock'. Coming soon: 'the cruising community'. Grrrrr.


anniec
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 669
Joined: December 2014

Re: So what?

Unread post by anniec »

anniec wrote:
Another irritation: the use of the word 'community' - the 'golfing community', the 'community is in shock'. Coming soon: 'the cruising community'. Grrrrr.
NB - Having just remembered the name of this forum, my mortification knows no bounds. I shall now go and shoot myself, which may make me part of the 'self harming community'. :D

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17025
Joined: February 2013

Re: So what?

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Quizzical Bob wrote:
If you listen to Kenneth Williams in Round the Horne he always made a point of Saint 'omarge'.
But he was joking. :thumbup:

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14169
Joined: January 2013

Re: So what?

Unread post by Onelife »

For obvious reasons l generally run for cover when threads such as this appear, but hey! as l am lying here wondering if my 32 in 12 hour visits to the loo have made it into the Guinness book of records l thought l would add my two pence worth.

Please don't see this as a criticism of what has already been said, but none of you have given any leeway to those who suffer with Dyslexia....and l do mean suffer because only those who are affected by it, or have some knowledge about it can really understand what a devastating effect it can have on your life. What appears to be bad grammar, careless spelling, etc often goes unoticed to many with dyslexia (Even having read the same passage of text several times) Thankfully these days, once diagnosed dyslexic sufferers have access to many aids that can help them compensate for their difficulties.

Having said all that l do think poor verbal and write grammar isn't something that should be encouraged and l do wonder if present day texting plays a part in why a lot of kids don't speak the Queens language like wot l do.

And just before l make my 42 visit to the loo we should not forget that most dialects have originated from what some would perceive as lazy vocabulary....amongst other thing of course.

Regards

Shity pants.

User avatar

jay-ell71
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 892
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cotswolds

Re: So what?

Unread post by jay-ell71 »

It is "different from" not "different than" . Splitting the infinitive, is now irritatingly in common use. Also saying "yourself" instead of you or "myself" instead of me. I could go on. J
Jay

User avatar

Happydays
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1905
Joined: June 2014

Re: So what?

Unread post by Happydays »

I agree with all of the replies..... these are some that irritate me.

When listening to the news (Sky and BBC) everything seems to be "issues" never "problems" in interviews I loose count how often issue is used the when it's really a problem or a subject even when they talked about the floods. For example if my home was flooded it would definately be a probem (for me)..... so no problems only issues! :crazy:
The latest phrase on Sky is "keeping across the story" instead of "keeping up to date" just waiting for the BBC to copy them and should I mention "focus"?

I could mention more but I will give someone else a turn :lol: :thumbup:

Return to “General Chat”