If anyone is having problems logging in and is getting the following message:

"The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again"

Then try clearing your browser cache

Brexit

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Manoverboard wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 09:22
Jack Staff wrote: 22 Sep 2018, 18:52
towny44 wrote: 22 Sep 2018, 17:08
I really am getting tired of the disparaging remarks about our great country from the remainers on here.
I really am getting tired of peoples actions that will lead to the break up of my great country.
NO comment that anybody makes on here could possibly lead to the break up of our Country …. only the EU negotiators or Nicola Sturgeon could come close …. neither are Members. :wave:
I don't think I even implied that members could do that. BUT, it will be NI to go first, Scotland to follow. To get WTO deals we need all members approval. How keen do you think Spain and Argentina will be to approve any deals we want, without specific concessions?

I am just a patriot who cares about my country, someone who does not want to see it damaged, either through ignorance or blind faith that everything will turn out alright in the end. It won't, unless we stop Brexit.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

https://www.thebalance.com/how-does-a-c ... er-3306362

I see no mention in the attached of any WTO member having a veto.

As for NI, well I personally favour democracy and if the voters in Ireland vote for unification, I'll happily live with that.
I can't see that happening anytime soon for financial reasons, but if they eventually do, then fine.

As for Scotland, the same applies. ask the people and if that is what they want, then good for them.
I think that has been done once already ?

I don't agree with holding a union together by fear of the consequences.
See what I did there ;)

On a serious note
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ ... 86f49e8b8b
Last edited by barney on 23 Sep 2018, 10:45, edited 1 time in total.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14189
Joined: January 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Onelife »


User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

barney wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 10:42
I see no mention in the attached of any WTO member having a veto.
Perhaps you should read the WTO website then.

"Reaching decisions by consensus among some 150 members can be difficult. Its main advantage is that decisions made this way are more acceptable to all members. And despite the difficulty, some remarkable agreements have been reached. Nevertheless, proposals for the creation of a smaller executive body — perhaps like a board of directors each representing different groups of countries — are heard periodically. But for now, the WTO is a member-driven, consensus-based organization. "
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14189
Joined: January 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Onelife »

Jack Staff wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 10:52
barney wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 10:42
I see no mention in the attached of any WTO member having a veto.
Perhaps you should read the WTO website then.

"Reaching decisions by consensus among some 150 members can be difficult. Its main advantage is that decisions made this way are more acceptable to all members. And despite the difficulty, some remarkable agreements have been reached. Nevertheless, proposals for the creation of a smaller executive body — perhaps like a board of directors each representing different groups of countries — are heard periodically. But for now, the WTO is a member-driven, consensus-based organization. "

I did jack......

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Onelife wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 10:59
Jack Staff wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 10:52
barney wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 10:42
I see no mention in the attached of any WTO member having a veto.
Perhaps you should read the WTO website then.

"Reaching decisions by consensus among some 150 members can be difficult. Its main advantage is that decisions made this way are more acceptable to all members. And despite the difficulty, some remarkable agreements have been reached. Nevertheless, proposals for the creation of a smaller executive body — perhaps like a board of directors each representing different groups of countries — are heard periodically. But for now, the WTO is a member-driven, consensus-based organization. "

I did jack......
You did what exactly?
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14189
Joined: January 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Onelife »

Read the wto website which is where the link l posted comes from......

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Onelife wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 11:15
Read the wto website which is where the link l posted comes from......
That links to Wikipedia???? Not the WTO.

Anyway I thought you didn't like links.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14189
Joined: January 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Onelife »

I only resort to links when it proves someone is talking rubbish :thumbup:


Dispute settlement or Dispute Settlement System (DSS) is regarded by the World Trade Organization (WTO) as the central pillar of the multilateral trading system, and as the organization's "unique contribution to the stability of the global economy".[1] A dispute arises when one member country adopts a trade policy measure or takes some action that one or more fellow members considers to a breach of WTO agreements or to be a failure to live up to obligations. By joining the WTO, member countries have agreed that if they believe fellow members are in violation of trade rules, they will use the multilateral system of settling disputes instead of taking action unilaterally — this entails abiding by agreed procedures—Dispute Settlement Understanding—and respecting judgments, primarily of the Dispute Settlement Board (DSB), the WTO organ responsible for adjudication of disputes.[2] A former WTO Director-General characterized the WTO dispute settlement system as "the most active international adjudicative mechanism in the world today."[3] Chad P. Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics and Petros Mavroidis of Columbia Law School remarked on the 20th year anniversary of the dispute settlement system that the system is "going strong" and that "there is no sign of weakening"

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Onelife wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 11:24
I only resort to links when it proves someone is talking rubbish :thumbup:


Dispute settlement or Dispute Settlement System (DSS) is regarded by the World Trade Organization (WTO) as the central pillar of the multilateral trading system, and as the organization's "unique contribution to the stability of the global economy".[1] A dispute arises when one member country adopts a trade policy measure or takes some action that one or more fellow members considers to a breach of WTO agreements or to be a failure to live up to obligations. By joining the WTO, member countries have agreed that if they believe fellow members are in violation of trade rules, they will use the multilateral system of settling disputes instead of taking action unilaterally — this entails abiding by agreed procedures—Dispute Settlement Understanding—and respecting judgments, primarily of the Dispute Settlement Board (DSB), the WTO organ responsible for adjudication of disputes.[2] A former WTO Director-General characterized the WTO dispute settlement system as "the most active international adjudicative mechanism in the world today."[3] Chad P. Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics and Petros Mavroidis of Columbia Law School remarked on the 20th year anniversary of the dispute settlement system that the system is "going strong" and that "there is no sign of weakening"
Well that explains a lot. I am talking about trade deals, whilst you are talking about dispute settlement. No wonder we both think the other is talking rubbish! :thumbup:
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14189
Joined: January 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Onelife »

Jack wrote.....

"To get WTO deals we need all members approval. How keen do you think Spain and Argentina will be to approve any deals we want, without specific concessions?"

If Spain or Argentina go against the principles of WTO rules (trade deals) then any country can take them to task using WTO disputes procedures.
Last edited by Onelife on 23 Sep 2018, 11:37, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Onelife wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 11:35
Jack wrote.....

"To get WTO deals we need all members approval. How keen do you think Spain and Argentina will be to approve any deals we want, without specific concessions?"

If Spain or Argentina go against the principles of WTO rules (trade deals) then any country can take them to task using WTO disputes procedures.
And just who would that country be? It could only be us. The WTO takes years to do anything, so while we may be 'in the right' we will be broke and getting broker, or we could just give them Gibraltar or the Falklands to resolve the situation.

However, things are beginning to move now and the chances of this being relevant to our future are diminishing rapidly.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Brexit

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Jack Staff wrote: 22 Sep 2018, 14:27
I do not yet know how I will vote.
It might be for Labour depending on what goes on at their current conference, if they realise that a Peoples Vote will get them elected.
So you are prepared to put a far left government of Corbyn, O'Donnell, Thornberry, Abbott ( :lol: ), backed by McCluskey & Co in power on the off chance they will grant you another vote which you may not win anyway? If you thought a no deal scenario was bad you ain't seen nothin' yet!!! And you talk about loving your country and wanting the best for it!!! :lolno:
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

oldbluefox wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:09
Jack Staff wrote: 22 Sep 2018, 14:27
I do not yet know how I will vote.
It might be for Labour depending on what goes on at their current conference, if they realise that a Peoples Vote will get them elected.
So you are prepared to put a far left government of Corbyn, O'Donnell, Thornberry, Abbott ( :lol: ), backed by McCluskey & Co in power on the off chance they will grant you another vote which you may not win anyway? If you thought a no deal scenario was bad you ain't seen nothin' yet!!! And you talk about loving your country and wanting the best for it!!! :lolno:
An election is only ever for a maximum of five years.
Nothing is more important to this country at present than stopping Brexit.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17774
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Stephen »

oldbluefox wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:09
Jack Staff wrote: 22 Sep 2018, 14:27
I do not yet know how I will vote.
It might be for Labour depending on what goes on at their current conference, if they realise that a Peoples Vote will get them elected.
So you are prepared to put a far left government of Corbyn, O'Donnell, Thornberry, Abbott ( :lol: ), backed by McCluskey & Co in power on the off chance they will grant you another vote which you may not win anyway? If you thought a no deal scenario was bad you ain't seen nothin' yet!!! And you talk about loving your country and wanting the best for it!!! :lolno:
Not to mention a once, or maybe still terrorist supporter...i.e. Sinn Féin

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

Stephen wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:18
oldbluefox wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:09
Jack Staff wrote: 22 Sep 2018, 14:27
I do not yet know how I will vote.
It might be for Labour depending on what goes on at their current conference, if they realise that a Peoples Vote will get them elected.
So you are prepared to put a far left government of Corbyn, O'Donnell, Thornberry, Abbott ( :lol: ), backed by McCluskey & Co in power on the off chance they will grant you another vote which you may not win anyway? If you thought a no deal scenario was bad you ain't seen nothin' yet!!! And you talk about loving your country and wanting the best for it!!! :lolno:
Not to mention a once, or maybe still terrorist supporter...i.e. Sinn Féin
Do we really want to get into arms to Saudi?
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Brexit

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Stephen wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:18
oldbluefox wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:09
Jack Staff wrote: 22 Sep 2018, 14:27
I do not yet know how I will vote.
It might be for Labour depending on what goes on at their current conference, if they realise that a Peoples Vote will get them elected.
So you are prepared to put a far left government of Corbyn, O'Donnell, Thornberry, Abbott ( :lol: ), backed by McCluskey & Co in power on the off chance they will grant you another vote which you may not win anyway? If you thought a no deal scenario was bad you ain't seen nothin' yet!!! And you talk about loving your country and wanting the best for it!!! :lolno:
Not to mention a once, or maybe still terrorist supporter...i.e. Sinn Féin
But who cares who we put in power just as long as we stop Brexit.................... Give me strength.
Why don't this Remainer 'lot' vote for Cable & Clogg or the Greens who are dedicated to their beloved People's Vote? In fact what was the point of having the referendum in the first place if you are not going to honour the result apart from the Remainers having a hissy fit cos they lost?
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

oldbluefox wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:29
Stephen wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:18
oldbluefox wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:09
Jack Staff wrote: 22 Sep 2018, 14:27
I do not yet know how I will vote.
It might be for Labour depending on what goes on at their current conference, if they realise that a Peoples Vote will get them elected.
So you are prepared to put a far left government of Corbyn, O'Donnell, Thornberry, Abbott ( :lol: ), backed by McCluskey & Co in power on the off chance they will grant you another vote which you may not win anyway? If you thought a no deal scenario was bad you ain't seen nothin' yet!!! And you talk about loving your country and wanting the best for it!!! :lolno:
Not to mention a once, or maybe still terrorist supporter...i.e. Sinn Féin
But who cares who we put in power just as long as we stop Brexit.................... Give me strength.
Why don't this Remainer 'lot' vote for Cable & Clogg or the Greens who are dedicated to their beloved People's Vote? In fact what was the point of having the referendum in the first place if you are not going to honour the result apart from the Remainers having a hissy fit cos they lost?
We will vote to stop Brexit at any election/referendum as is our democratic right.
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

Jack Staff wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 11:41
Onelife wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 11:35
Jack wrote.....

"To get WTO deals we need all members approval. How keen do you think Spain and Argentina will be to approve any deals we want, without specific concessions?"

If Spain or Argentina go against the principles of WTO rules (trade deals) then any country can take them to task using WTO disputes procedures.
And just who would that country be? It could only be us. The WTO takes years to do anything, so while we may be 'in the right' we will be broke and getting broker, or we could just give them Gibraltar or the Falklands to resolve the situation.

However, things are beginning to move now and the chances of this being relevant to our future are diminishing rapidly.

I think that you are being a tad reactionary there Jack.

We could not 'give' anyone the Falkland islands or Gibraltar because they do not belong to the UK.
They are classed as British Overseas Territories like many Caribbean Islands

Should the people of The Flaklands or Gibraltar decide that they would prefer to be Argentinian or Spanish, then only they could make that happen by a democratic vote.

See what I did there again ;)

Democracy.

One thing that I do know about WTO is that the UK is already a member, as are all the other EU countries, but bizarrely so is the EU as an entity ???
One problem for the future could be that the EU are very secrective about existing WTO agreements with third countries and EU countries no not have full access to this data.
So, the UK (or any of the others) can never really know for certain what the existing agreements are.

Not democracy :moresarcasm:
Free and Accepted

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Brexit

Unread post by barney »

Jack Staff wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:34
oldbluefox wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:29
Stephen wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:18
oldbluefox wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:09

So you are prepared to put a far left government of Corbyn, O'Donnell, Thornberry, Abbott ( :lol: ), backed by McCluskey & Co in power on the off chance they will grant you another vote which you may not win anyway? If you thought a no deal scenario was bad you ain't seen nothin' yet!!! And you talk about loving your country and wanting the best for it!!! :lolno:
Not to mention a once, or maybe still terrorist supporter...i.e. Sinn Féin
But who cares who we put in power just as long as we stop Brexit.................... Give me strength.
Why don't this Remainer 'lot' vote for Cable & Clogg or the Greens who are dedicated to their beloved People's Vote? In fact what was the point of having the referendum in the first place if you are not going to honour the result apart from the Remainers having a hissy fit cos they lost?
We will vote to stop Brexit at any election/referendum as is our democratic right.
Hooray, we are there at last !!!!!!

When the next election /and/or referendum comes, vote which ever way you like.

If you want to vote for a party that has vowed to stop Brexit, then fine, please do it.

That is you democratic right.

This will more than likely be in 2022 so be patient :thumbup:
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

barney wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:36
Jack Staff wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 11:41
Onelife wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 11:35
Jack wrote.....

"To get WTO deals we need all members approval. How keen do you think Spain and Argentina will be to approve any deals we want, without specific concessions?"

If Spain or Argentina go against the principles of WTO rules (trade deals) then any country can take them to task using WTO disputes procedures.
And just who would that country be? It could only be us. The WTO takes years to do anything, so while we may be 'in the right' we will be broke and getting broker, or we could just give them Gibraltar or the Falklands to resolve the situation.

However, things are beginning to move now and the chances of this being relevant to our future are diminishing rapidly.

I think that you are being a tad reactionary there Jack.

We could not 'give' anyone the Falkland islands or Gibraltar because they do not belong to the UK.
They are classed as British Overseas Territories like many Caribbean Islands

Should the people of The Flaklands or Gibraltar decide that they would prefer to be Argentinian or Spanish, then only they could make that happen by a democratic vote.

See what I did there again ;)

Democracy.
So what you are suggesting is that leave on WTO, to then not be able to get any deals due to our territories?
Brilliant.

barney wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:36
One thing that I do know about WTO is that the UK is already a member, as are all the other EU countries, but bizarrely so is the EU as an entity ???
One problem for the future could be that the EU are very secrective about existing WTO agreements with third countries and EU countries no not have full access to this data.
So, the UK (or any of the others) can never really know for certain what the existing agreements are.

Not democracy :moresarcasm:
No one has ever suggested the WTO is democratic.
It is a trading body made up of unelected bureaucrats. Something you say you don't like. :crazy:
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

Jack Staff
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1656
Joined: September 2016

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Jack Staff »

barney wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:39
Hooray, we are there at last !!!!!!

When the next election /and/or referendum comes, vote which ever way you like.

If you want to vote for a party that has vowed to stop Brexit, then fine, please do it.

That is you democratic right.

This will more than likely be in 2022 so be patient :thumbup:
OMG!! I was thinking the next election would be called in a couple of weeks time, but 20:22? I will be in the middle of my supper then!
Testiculi ad Brexitum. Venceremos.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Brexit

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Jack Staff wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:48
barney wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:39
Hooray, we are there at last !!!!!!

When the next election /and/or referendum comes, vote which ever way you like.

If you want to vote for a party that has vowed to stop Brexit, then fine, please do it.

That is you democratic right.

This will more than likely be in 2022 so be patient :thumbup:
OMG!! I was thinking the next election would be called in a couple of weeks time, but 20:22? I will be in the middle of my supper then!
Not as good as your other jokes but quite good Jack. :thumbup:
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14189
Joined: January 2013

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Onelife »

oldbluefox wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 14:05
Jack Staff wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:48
barney wrote: 23 Sep 2018, 13:39
Hooray, we are there at last !!!!!!

When the next election /and/or referendum comes, vote which ever way you like.

If you want to vote for a party that has vowed to stop Brexit, then fine, please do it.

That is you democratic right.

This will more than likely be in 2022 so be patient :thumbup:
OMG!! I was thinking the next election would be called in a couple of weeks time, but 20:22? I will be in the middle of my supper then!
Not as good as your other jokes but quite good Jack. :thumbup:
Are you talking "crackers"again Jack? :lol:

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Brexit

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Having supper at 20:22 obviously isn't good for you …. it makes one grumpy. :lol:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

Return to “General Chat”