She will have to discourage her regulars who liked to pop in for a chat.
So many used to say, I’m not buying and then go ooh that’s nice
Being a small shop, she has decided to click the latch up once someone is in.


And don't unclick the latch until they have parted with £80 would be my advisebarney wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:18One thing is for sure.
She will have to discourage her regulars who liked to pop in for a chat.
So many used to say, I’m not buying and then go ooh that’s nice
Being a small shop, she has decided to click the latch up once someone is in.
You may have the App but the person you potentially catch the virus from hasn't got the App = you will have a false sense of security whilst hiding behind your App. Sod the Government, my thinking is that Mobietta and I will only venture out when it is 100% safe for us to do so ... and I doubt we will be alone in that thinking regardless of how many phones we take with us.Onelife wrote: 28 May 2020, 14:58... I think the principal the Government will be working to is that many won't download the app whether that be from ignorance, cyber concerns, or as you say lack of technology know how/ access to phones.
I think it's going to be a case of every little bit helps and l for one will will be downloading the app. As l hope millions of others will be doing the same.... whilst appreciating everyone has different cercumstances to consider....should it be made compulsory due to lack of uptake then the decision is taken out of our hands.
![]()

I am sure I read somewhere a while back that for the app to be successful it needs at least 50% of the population to use it which in turn necessitates about 80% of mobile phone users to download the app and apparently this was not a problem on the IOWManoverboard wrote: 28 May 2020, 13:51And what about the umpteen numbers of Oldies who do not have Smart Phones / can't read their small screens / wouldn't know an App from a Apple etc. They, imo, will either continue staying at home else be walking about in a state of anxiety wondering who they might / might not come into contact with.

That is never going to happen - no matter what there will always be Covid-19 around. The only virus to have been totally eradicated worldwide is smallpox.Manoverboard wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:36my thinking is that Mobietta and I will only venture out when it is 100% safe for us to do so

In which case we will be staying in. No way will we risk driving to Barney's shop and coming home in a gift wrapped box.david63 wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:39That is never going to happen - no matter what there will always be Covid-19 around. The only virus to have been totally eradicated worldwide is smallpox.Manoverboard wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:36my thinking is that Mobietta and I will only venture out when it is 100% safe for us to do so

I was wondering, Barney, has your wife considered opening an online shop? If nothing else, she might be able to shift the excess stock.barney wrote: 28 May 2020, 14:38
She could just renage on her lease, close down, sell the stock to a market trader.
But she won’t.
She’ll carry on trading and doing her best.
If it becomes unprofitable, which could happen due to the fact that she’s about 15k down already this financial year, she will then reconsider.
It’s not sensible to subsidise a business.
One thing is for sure, she won’t be continually opening and closing

This service is made up of two parts. You get your test done, and if you test positive, the NHS Test and Trace Service will get in touch by email or text message to tell you how to share the details of the people you have been in contact with. They might tell you to give the info online, or they may phone you. So you'd be expecting a phone call.towny44 wrote: 28 May 2020, 13:33There is now a concern whether you will be able to guarantee the caller is a genuine tracer and not a scammer. How do they imagine the scammers are going to know who has been tested positive, unless they are going to ring everyone?
What level of intelligence is required for TV news presenters?

But even then you will not be 100% safeManoverboard wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:50I choose to believe that there will be a magic jab coming along sooner rather than later
But it'll be a whole lot safer than it is right now, if needs be we could arrange with chums / family to have a test prior to meeting up ... something else that will become readily available and possibly instant.david63 wrote: 28 May 2020, 16:26But even then you will not be 100% safeManoverboard wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:50I choose to believe that there will be a magic jab coming along sooner rather than later


No she hasn’t Gill .Gill W wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:52I was wondering, Barney, has your wife considered opening an online shop? If nothing else, she might be able to shift the excess stock.barney wrote: 28 May 2020, 14:38
She could just renage on her lease, close down, sell the stock to a market trader.
But she won’t.
She’ll carry on trading and doing her best.
If it becomes unprofitable, which could happen due to the fact that she’s about 15k down already this financial year, she will then reconsider.
It’s not sensible to subsidise a business.
One thing is for sure, she won’t be continually opening and closing

We have a good few independent shops in Ludlow and they are what gives our town its character…long may they continuebarney wrote: 28 May 2020, 18:03No she hasn’t Gill .Gill W wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:52I was wondering, Barney, has your wife considered opening an online shop? If nothing else, she might be able to shift the excess stock.barney wrote: 28 May 2020, 14:38
She could just renage on her lease, close down, sell the stock to a market trader.
But she won’t.
She’ll carry on trading and doing her best.
If it becomes unprofitable, which could happen due to the fact that she’s about 15k down already this financial year, she will then reconsider.
It’s not sensible to subsidise a business.
One thing is for sure, she won’t be continually opening and closing
It would totally defeat the point of being a local independent that offers excellent personal service.
She won’t even buy from a clothes supplier who sell online.
She has a niche that has so far, been successful.

I know she may be really happy with her chosen market but she is missing a trick if she does not create even an eBay presence ... totally different name, totally unrelated operating as a separate entity. It is forecast that we may go back into lock down a few times before this is over, so an online presence allows the business to tick over during those periods (and maybe get rid of slow moving stock). She can still offer excellent service.barney wrote: 28 May 2020, 18:03No she hasn’t Gill .Gill W wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:52I was wondering, Barney, has your wife considered opening an online shop? If nothing else, she might be able to shift the excess stock.barney wrote: 28 May 2020, 14:38
She could just renage on her lease, close down, sell the stock to a market trader.
But she won’t.
She’ll carry on trading and doing her best.
If it becomes unprofitable, which could happen due to the fact that she’s about 15k down already this financial year, she will then reconsider.
It’s not sensible to subsidise a business.
One thing is for sure, she won’t be continually opening and closing
It would totally defeat the point of being a local independent that offers excellent personal service.
She won’t even buy from a clothes supplier who sell online.
She has a niche that has so far, been successful.

Hi Ken, l'm sure Barney will be along shortly but l have heard Barney say on several occasions that his wife's shop has a specialised niche element to its sales, so one would presume it's the kind of shop were you need to see it, feel it, then buy it.....kinda shopping outlet.?Kendhni wrote: 29 May 2020, 08:08I know she may be really happy with her chosen market but she is missing a trick if she does not create even an eBay presence ... totally different name, totally unrelated operating as a separate entity. It is forecast that we may go back into lock down a few times before this is over, so an online presence allows the business to tick over during those periods (and maybe get rid of slow moving stock). She can still offer excellent service.barney wrote: 28 May 2020, 18:03No she hasn’t Gill .Gill W wrote: 28 May 2020, 15:52
I was wondering, Barney, has your wife considered opening an online shop? If nothing else, she might be able to shift the excess stock.
It would totally defeat the point of being a local independent that offers excellent personal service.
She won’t even buy from a clothes supplier who sell online.
She has a niche that has so far, been successful.
Having said that she may not want the hassle of online buyers (who often buy stuff just because they are bored and have every intention of returning it).



I wouldn't be surprised if they weren't helping them into backs of lorries as wellscrewy wrote: 29 May 2020, 11:40It appears the French Navy have been caught out, escorting boats of migrants across the channel to hand them over to Border Force/Dover Lifeboat, and like the soft sods that we are we are accepting them instead of turning them round.

Shouldn't this be on your NON Covid channelscrewy wrote: 29 May 2020, 14:18It seems talks haven’t been going too well for the Eu.It appears that the remainers are trying to push through a 2 yr extension? Do they forget , the government have a healthy majority.?

