Current Affairs

Chat about anything here

anniec
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 669
Joined: December 2014

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by anniec »

Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:32
What l do know is that the person in question works for several care/nursing home providers who have brought her in to deliver what the CQC have recommended theses providers must do to meet standards of compliance.
Talking of the CQC, should part of their remit have involved keeping a beady eye on what was going on in care homes? Instead of which, at least according to a report I've read, they simply stopped visiting them.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14155
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

anniec wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:45
Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:32
What l do know is that the person in question works for several care/nursing home providers who have brought her in to deliver what the CQC have recommended theses providers must do to meet standards of compliance.
Talking of the CQC, should part of their remit have involved keeping a beady eye on what was going on in care homes? Instead of which, at least according to a report I've read, they simply stopped visiting them.
One would presume so if that is what they do

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10933
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by david63 »

anniec wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:45
they simply stopped visiting them
That is something that I would have expected unless there were some extenuating circumstances as to why they would need to.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17017
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Our daughter's care home has only had essential people from outside, deliveries for example, and then not allowed right in.


anniec
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 669
Joined: December 2014

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by anniec »

david63 wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:54
anniec wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:45
they simply stopped visiting them
That is something that I would have expected unless there were some extenuating circumstances as to why they would need to.
Looking at the appalling death toll, there clearly were extenuating circumstances... According to their website: "we will still visit if we think there's a risk of harm or abuse".

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Manoverboard wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:09
Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 07:43
Yes some certainly are badly run, bad enough for my wife's friend to ask her to contact the BBC Panorama program in order to relay what is going on is some of these privately run Care/Nursing homes.... my wife did this a few weeks back.
And without knowing where they are my guess would be that they are in places where the Hospitals are equally poorly run, if so would that mean that it is the Regional Trust that needs shooting ?
Does a regional trust have any jurisdiction over a private care or nursing home in the current set up? If not maybe it should have, and there clearly needs to be a much closer relationship between hospitals and care homes, where a care home resident moves between the two.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:43
The areas she covers are to the East and South of where l used to live. :thumbup:
Got it ... so the Hospital / Trust with a rather bad reputation, that I am aware of anyway, begins with the first letter of the word after you ? :shifty:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

towny44 wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 09:20
Manoverboard wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:09
Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 07:43
Yes some certainly are badly run, bad enough for my wife's friend to ask her to contact the BBC Panorama program in order to relay what is going on is some of these privately run Care/Nursing homes.... my wife did this a few weeks back.
And without knowing where they are my guess would be that they are in places where the Hospitals are equally poorly run, if so would that mean that it is the Regional Trust that needs shooting ?
Does a regional trust have any jurisdiction over a private care or nursing home in the current set up? If not maybe it should have, and there clearly needs to be a much closer relationship between hospitals and care homes, where a care home resident moves between the two.
I was suggesting that a rubbish care home is likely to be in the same location as a rubbish Hospital but one would need to ask OL how much influence and interaction one has with the other which is why I asked my highlighted question above.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10933
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by david63 »

towny44 wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 09:20
Does a regional trust have any jurisdiction over a private care or nursing home in the current set up?
Not Trust but all homes are registered with the local authority and they have certain statutory duties. However I suspect that many of the "day to day" things have taken a back set

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17017
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Yes the NHS doesn't have any direct control over care homes but it's one of the issues successive governments going back more than 20 years have promised to sort and none have. There needs to be joined up health and social care but there isn't. So when money is short, as it always is, they play pass the parcel granny.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14155
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Manoverboard wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 09:30
towny44 wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 09:20
Manoverboard wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 08:09

And without knowing where they are my guess would be that they are in places where the Hospitals are equally poorly run, if so would that mean that it is the Regional Trust that needs shooting ?
Does a regional trust have any jurisdiction over a private care or nursing home in the current set up? If not maybe it should have, and there clearly needs to be a much closer relationship between hospitals and care homes, where a care home resident moves between the two.
I was suggesting that a rubbish care home is likely to be in the same location as a rubbish Hospital but one would need to ask OL how much influence and interaction one has with the other which is why I asked my highlighted question above.
Hi Mob…The honest answer is that I don’t know what the interaction is between care/nursing homes and hospitals is but I do know some hospitals are better than other at freeing up hospital beds by way of care/nursing homes route. I was told of one excellent nurse manager who has recently left a well-known Nursing home provider due to him being put under pressure to accept a patient he suspected might have covid.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

How it works is that the local social services get involved.
The hospital will have a health worker attached.
The health worker contacts local care homes to find one that A has a vacancy and B can cope with the patients needs.
Someone from the nursing home will visit the patient in hospital and do an assessment.

If it all fits, the patient will be transferred to the care/ nursing home.
Once in the home, social services again get involved to ascertain the new residents ability to pay for their care.
If they have a total estate valued at over 24k including property, they are expected to pay in full until the amount they have falls below 23k.
They can not make anyone sell their home but they do put a charge on it so the resident just runs up a bill.

It can and does work out very expensive.
I’d recommend anyone taking appropriate action while they still have full mental capacity to protect family assets.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

barney wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 13:01
They can not make anyone sell their home but they do put a charge on it so the resident just runs up a bill.

It can and does work out very expensive.
I’d recommend anyone taking appropriate action while they still have full mental capacity to protect family assets.
They ( cannot ? ) but certainly could not put a charge on it if the remaining occupant no longer happens to own the property they are living in but has the right to remain in it for their lifetime. They can then add a pay up front charge based on the notional interest on the value of said property. The managing of this loophole, I am told, is now much harder than it used to be and if attempted should not be left until the last minute. Is that approach still workable Barney ?
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14155
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

What is clear is that it is an unfair system and needs changing. I know there has been talk about increasing the “before you pay” threshold but living longer will see you losing money quicker than I can lose it at the bookies.

Having lived in a tin-can for the past 20 years there isn’t going to be a lot to leave my daughter but if anyone has any suggestions on how I can pass on my tin-can as painlessly as possible I’m all ears.

If there is no way round it, I just hope I’m of sound mind to make the right decision.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Moby is correct.
Deprivation of assets is now actually illegal, however, there are things that can be done in advance.
Setting up a property trust is one way but you must accept that you know longer own your own property.
We’ve rescheduled the ownership of the house into tenants in common, 50/50 share with on the first death, transferring to a trust via the Will.
It’s a bit complicated but legal (at the moment)
If either of us needs a care home after the other has died, at least only fifty percent of the overall value can be counted, leaving the other half in trust for beneficiaries.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14155
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

barney wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 16:38
Moby is correct.
Deprivation of assets is now actually illegal, however, there are things that can be done in advance.
Setting up a property trust is one way but you must accept that you know longer own your own property.
We’ve rescheduled the ownership of the house into tenants in common, 50/50 share with on the first death, transferring to a trust via the Will.
It’s a bit complicated but legal (at the moment)
If either of us needs a care home after the other has died, at least only fifty percent of the overall value can be counted, leaving the other half in trust for beneficiaries.
Thanks for that Barney I shall look into it :thumbup:

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14155
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Hi Barney…if we disd as you have done and one of us was left in the property but wanted to downsize would the 50% be tied up in the trust?

Thanks

Keith

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 17:32
Hi Barney…if we disd as you have done and one of us was left in the property but wanted to downsize would the 50% be tied up in the trust?
Thanks
Keith
Methinks that the very best advice would be for you to talk to a Solicitor although I readily concede that Barney may have a different opiniion and especially so as you asked him the question.
.
Last edited by Manoverboard on 04 Jul 2020, 18:16, edited 1 time in total.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17017
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

barney wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 16:38
Moby is correct.
Deprivation of assets is now actually illegal, however, there are things that can be done in advance.
Setting up a property trust is one way but you must accept that you know longer own your own property.
We’ve rescheduled the ownership of the house into tenants in common, 50/50 share with on the first death, transferring to a trust via the Will.
It’s a bit complicated but legal (at the moment)
If either of us needs a care home after the other has died, at least only fifty percent of the overall value can be counted, leaving the other half in trust for beneficiaries.
That is exactly what we have done, with the trustees being whichever of us is the survivor and our daughter, who is the ultimate beneficiary. Our solicitor advised us it is a legitimate loophole but that the government might in time close it.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17017
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Just watching Channel 4 news and crowds on the streets in Soho. They must be made. Standby for more local lockdowns.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 17:32
Hi Barney…if we disd as you have done and one of us was left in the property but wanted to downsize would the 50% be tied up in the trust?

Thanks

Keith
It would indeed Keefy.
It would ultimately be at the discretion of the trustees but the general idea is to name your beneficiaries as trustees.
So, in essence, the surviving partner holds half and the trust holds the other half.
When it comes to assets , the local authority can only count what you actually own i.e. half of the value of the house.
They could not include what is owned by the trust.
If you want information, talk to a solicitor who specialises in this, not just a general run of the mill solicitor. When they do their training, they spend about ten minutes on wills and estate planning.
Alternatively a good professional will writer could sort you out. Look for the Institute of Professional Will Writers logo.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14155
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

barney wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 18:47
Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 17:32
Hi Barney…if we disd as you have done and one of us was left in the property but wanted to downsize would the 50% be tied up in the trust?

Thanks

Keith
It would indeed Keefy.
It would ultimately be at the discretion of the trustees but the general idea is to name your beneficiaries as trustees.
So, in essence, the surviving partner holds half and the trust holds the other half.
When it comes to assets , the local authority can only count what you actually own i.e. half of the value of the house.
They could not include what is owned by the trust.
If you want information, talk to a solicitor who specialises in this, not just a general run of the mill solicitor. When they do their training, they spend about ten minutes on wills and estate planning.
Alternatively a good professional will writer could sort you out. Look for the Institute of Professional Will Writers logo.
Thanks Barney…I’ll consult the wife “who has her head screwed on” and decide which way she wants to go. Squeak! Squeak!

:wave:

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 19:07
Thanks Barney…I’ll consult the wife “who has her head screwed on” and decide which way she wants to go. Squeak! Squeak!

:wave:
If she's got any sense she'll go out :lol:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14155
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Manoverboard wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 19:08
Onelife wrote: 04 Jul 2020, 19:07
Thanks Barney…I’ll consult the wife “who has her head screwed on” and decide which way she wants to go. Squeak! Squeak!

:wave:
If she's got any sense she'll go out :lol:
She’ll be back…she loves me irrespective of the 3.5 million I have in my bank account :thumbup: :lol:

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Absolutely inundated with Caravans and Motor Homes yesterday.
Summer has officially started in the West Country.
What is it like where you are?
Free and Accepted

Return to “General Chat”