Hi John, that is a fair response and may find some support on this forum but the Government supposedly takes its advice from the science, and as the science is constantly shifting towards the wearing of face masks then I think one has to take this onboard…I’d be wearing one even if it only protects the wearer 5%.towny44 wrote: 12 Jul 2020, 21:20Keith, I am not sure what point you are making, surely if the scientific community have differing views it is because of the uncertainty concerning that particular aspect. You believe facemasks are an important precaution others believe they don't provide much protection. Both positions could find scientific support which leads me to be sympathetic with both sides, but not critical of either.Onelife wrote: 12 Jul 2020, 20:39Hi John, I don’t care much for percentages because they only reflect numbers and the number, I care about is how many are dying because of not using common sence…sod what the Government tells you to do and make your own mind up… 44,000 + dead should be enough to tell everyone they should taking every precaution possible.towny44 wrote: 12 Jul 2020, 18:13
If the protection is 75% to protect others, and only 15-20% to protect the wearer, then I imagine taking it on and off is only going to pose problems to the wearer, and even these will be fairly low.
There is another aspect to this which is that the science says a mask protects others from infection, this being the case surly the sensible thing to do is promote it as such bringing everyone onboard. We don’t know who the carriers are so the more that wear them the safer we all should be…hopefully!






