If anyone is having problems logging in and is getting the following message:

"The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again"

Then try clearing your browser cache

Current Affairs

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Gill W wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 11:21
My observation is the Covid scepticism is strongest amongst right wing types whose news source is GB News.
My perception is different for a couple of reasons. Firstly GB news didn't launch until mid 2021, long after Covid scepticism was born. Secondly our local newspaper launched a Facebook group with Covid information way back in the early days of the pandemic. It has been plagued with derogatory comments from the beginning from keyboard warriors who almost invariably combine their Covid dismissal with attacks on the government in general and Boris in particular. And of course the poster boy of Covid scepticism is Piers Corbyn, about as far left as you can get.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Gill W wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 11:21
I don’t know how a mad man with nukes can be stopped. If Putin is successful in Ukraine, what else will he do. Estonia and the Balkan states ? Finland?
I think if he is stopped it is most likely to be from within, rather than anything we or our allies do. It seems clear that although currently violently suppressed there is a lot of opposition to him within Russia and even within the Kremlin. Longer term a coup would not surprise me, Let's hope in the meantime the Russian have a similar system to the US that requires more than one finger on the nuclear button.

User avatar

Topic author
Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17774
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Stephen »

As for sanctions, I’m sure he’s already counter thought anything the West throw at him. Anyway, I thought sanctions only worked on poorer countries, which rules out Russia.

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

I think the west gave him plenty of time to extract money and assets. Then when the pitiful sanctions came earlier in the week they had plenty of time to adjust their plans accordingly. The full weight of sanctions should have been delivered on day 1 of his invasion.

It was sad to hear the story of 13 brave Ukrainians tasked with defending an island and the Russian ship telling them to surrender .. their response was to tell the commies to 'go F*** yourselves. The cowardly commies then missiled the island.

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Gill W wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 11:21
My observation is the Covid scepticism is strongest amongst right wing types whose news source is GB News.
There was a survey done on this https://rpubs.com/benwansell/729135. To be honest I don't think it was overly definitive, but the implied outcome was that those that believe they are free-thinkers, are anti-system and generally believe conspiracy theories, were more likely to be against the vaccination.
All we can do is stick with our allies, like the US and the EU.
:thumbup: :thumbup:

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Russia is not Communist.
Every fool knows that (except one) 😂
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14191
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

"'To anyone who would consider interfering from the outside - if you do, you will face consequences,’ greater than any you have faced in history"

Puktin

Just received a text from our daughter who works for a government department advising staff not open anything that looks suspicious due to the heightened risk of cyber-attacks. This isn’t unexpected under the circumstances but it makes me wonder if this is what Puking means when threating “greater than any you have faced in history”?

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Curiously a friend of mine, though not one whose views I share, is blaming Brexit for the invasion of Ukraine. A bit of a stretch I think.

And I see that Russia hasn't been banned from Swift, the global banking system, because the EU wouldn't agree to it, despite pressure from the UK and the US, due to resistance from some unnamed countries.
Onelife wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 13:00

"'To anyone who would consider interfering from the outside - if you do, you will face consequences,’ greater than any you have faced in history"

Puktin

Just received a text from our daughter who works for a government department advising staff not open anything that looks suspicious due to the heightened risk of cyber-attacks. This isn’t unexpected under the circumstances but it makes me wonder if this is what Puking means when threating “greater than any you have faced in history”?
My worry is he means worse than that.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14191
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

It did cross my mind Sir Merv but this is the reason we and other are sitting on the fence. I think you are right in that the only way to get rid of this dictator is with a bullet through his head following a coup.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Lest we forget the EU orchestrated, through Uefa, a response to the Russian by moving the Champions League Footy Final from St Petes to Paris ... oh yes :clap:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Onelife wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 13:00
"'To anyone who would consider interfering from the outside - if you do, you will face consequences,’ greater than any you have faced in history"

Puktin

Just received a text from our daughter who works for a government department advising staff not open anything that looks suspicious due to the heightened risk of cyber-attacks. This isn’t unexpected under the circumstances but it makes me wonder if this is what Puking means when threating “greater than any you have faced in history”?
Yesterday morning our company forced everyone to update their passwords with a whole new much more detailed requirement.
For anyone else nervous about their own passwords then remember the most important 3 elements of password creation are length, length and length. I now recommend a minimum length of 16 character mixed case.

All the requirements for numerics, special symbols etc. is just 'nice-to-haves' but can actually introduce a risk into password management (as can passwords generated through password managers). Throw in a the odd number or special character if you want, but it adds little to your security.

Mind you, if quantum computing is realised then security and encryption will also need a total rethink.
Last edited by Kendhni on 25 Feb 2022, 14:25, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 13:04
Curiously a friend of mine, though not one whose views I share, is blaming Brexit for the invasion of Ukraine. A bit of a stretch I think.
Seriously, was there a smell of cannabis around him?
It wasn't a chap called Peston by any chance?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics ... s-sefcovic

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

No. A staunch Green voter. Need I say more?

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Onelife wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 13:15
It did cross my mind Sir Merv but this is the reason we and other are sitting on the fence. I think you are right in that the only way to get rid of this dictator is with a bullet through his head following a coup.
Send Bond

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10941
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by david63 »

Kendhni wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 12:47
I think the west gave him plenty of time to extract money and assets. Then when the pitiful sanctions came earlier in the week they had plenty of time to adjust their plans accordingly. The full weight of sanctions should have been delivered on day 1 of his invasion.
In the first instance Russia has been moving assets for years in preparation of sanctions being imposed so it makes little difference when they were imposed. Secondly sanctions are not a short term action and will take several months to have any affect. And then there is the argument that if sanctions were imposed too soon that Putin would have no disincentive (not that there was much anyway) to abandon any invasion.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Apart from that we don't want to upset him too much in case he cuts off our gas supplies ....
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Manoverboard wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 15:22
Apart from that we don't want to upset him too much in case he cuts off our gas supplies ....
We don’t use much Russian gas .
What affects our price if lack of gas on the market which pushes up everyone’s price.
Personally, I’d like to see total sanctions.
Nothing in
Nothing out
Buy nothing
Sell nothing
Literally cut them off at the knees financially.
The only people who can remove Putin are internal.
I’d also cut all sporting ties and ban them from all international competition .
Ban all flights from and to Russia.
No holidays for Russian people outside Russia.
Seize all state assets and assets of known Putin supporters in the U.K. and encourage European countries to do similar.
Last edited by barney on 25 Feb 2022, 16:05, edited 1 time in total.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

It's okay I ditched my gas cooker. I now cook on electricity entirely from renewable, allegedly. And I've requested only UK gas for my boiler.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

I saw an argument that said it would be pointless fracking for gas as we'd only export it anyway. That seems to lack imagination. I'd go ahead with fracking but make it a condition of approval that the companies only sold it to the UK market and at a fixed and affordable price agreed with the government before they started work. We have 50 plus years supply down there. Why are we importing anyway?

User avatar

Topic author
Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17774
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Stephen »

Manoverboard wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 15:22
Apart from that we don't want to upset him too much in case he cuts off our gas supplies ....

Better stock up on logs Moby before they hike the prices up. :)

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 14:35
Onelife wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 13:15
It did cross my mind Sir Merv but this is the reason we and other are sitting on the fence. I think you are right in that the only way to get rid of this dictator is with a bullet through his head following a coup.
Send Bond
He's dead

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

david63 wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 15:21
Kendhni wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 12:47
I think the west gave him plenty of time to extract money and assets. Then when the pitiful sanctions came earlier in the week they had plenty of time to adjust their plans accordingly. The full weight of sanctions should have been delivered on day 1 of his invasion.
In the first instance Russia has been moving assets for years in preparation of sanctions being imposed so it makes little difference when they were imposed. Secondly sanctions are not a short term action and will take several months to have any affect.
Agree totally ... sneaky buggers those commies.
And then there is the argument that if sanctions were imposed too soon that Putin would have no disincentive (not that there was much anyway) to abandon any invasion.
Unfortunately with what happened, we sent out the message that the west had no stomach for any kind of conflict ... pretty much saying 'do what you want, but be prepared for us to use stronger adjectives'.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 16:05
I saw an argument that said it would be pointless fracking for gas as we'd only export it anyway. That seems to lack imagination. I'd go ahead with fracking but make it a condition of approval that the companies only sold it to the UK market and at a fixed and affordable price agreed with the government before they started work. We have 50 plus years supply down there. Why are we importing anyway?
Merv, it's you I'm backing, so lets get fracking.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Ray B
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3549
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Ray B »

There's enough gas under the sea that was not that profitable, after the price of gas shot up on the wholesale market, maybe a chance to get some wells uncapped. Maggie did waste our 'cheap' gas from the sea, something we never had through our meters.
Don't worry, be happy

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Ray B wrote: 25 Feb 2022, 20:44
There's enough gas under the sea that was not that profitable, after the price of gas shot up on the wholesale market, maybe a chance to get some wells uncapped. Maggie did waste our 'cheap' gas from the sea, something we never had through our meters.
I doubt that Maggie decided where or how to sell our natural gas, but equally I doubt that any imports we made cost us more than our own gas would have.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

Return to “General Chat”