If anyone is having problems logging in and is getting the following message:

"The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again"

Then try clearing your browser cache

Current Affairs

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

A bit of good news
https://uk.yahoo.com/russia-ukraine-lat ... 46328.html

Looks like the Ukrainians have stood up and are pushing the mighty Russian army back... almost single handedly. Fantastic resolve and dedication to their country, led by a true leader.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Kendhni wrote: 29 Mar 2022, 16:18
Gill W wrote: 29 Mar 2022, 15:37
Kendhni wrote: 29 Mar 2022, 12:37

Agreed ... I have always said it was not about parties ... especially since I am sure most of the population bent/broke the rules when it suited them ... it was about the incessant lies, incompetence and misinformation streaming out of number 10.
For me it's the law breaking by the people who made the laws while the vast majority of us were doing the right thing. They made mugs of us all.

Then , if that wasn't enough, it's the lying afterwards to misdirect and cover it up. Johnson misled the House of Commons and that's a resignation matter. No ifs, no buts
Exactly, look at the dichotomy between the dignity and following of guidance shown by the Queen at Philips funeral versus those who apparently felt the rules did not apply to them
Whilst agreeing that the Royals handling of the D of E funeral was completely at variance with Downing streets Xmas parties, I would suggest that if Xmas in Downing street had been live on TV then things would have been handled differently.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

towny44 wrote: 29 Mar 2022, 18:59
Whilst agreeing that the Royals handling of the D of E funeral was completely at variance with Downing streets Xmas parties, I would suggest that if Xmas in Downing street had been live on TV then things would have been handled differently.
Johnson would still claim it didn't happen in his daily apology briefings :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Kendhni wrote: 29 Mar 2022, 21:08
towny44 wrote: 29 Mar 2022, 18:59
Whilst agreeing that the Royals handling of the D of E funeral was completely at variance with Downing streets Xmas parties, I would suggest that if Xmas in Downing street had been live on TV then things would have been handled differently.
Johnson would still claim it didn't happen in his daily apology briefings :lol: :lol: :lol:
Reasonable point but content edited to

I think we all know opinions of him by now, and repetition is not going to change anyone's mind.
Last edited by Manoverboard on 30 Mar 2022, 09:15, edited 1 time in total.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

At the minute it looks like the commies cannot be trusted ...
"It's a trap, it's a trap", Admiral Ackbar

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

I think it is a shame that what should have been a memorial service and celebration of the life of the Duke of Edinburgh has been hijacked and turned into a media circus around a single headline of Andrews role ('The pain ... The stain'). I really don't know what the Queen or her advisors were thinking, she is usually much more media savvy than this.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

I think it's a shame that the media decided they would hijack the reports on the memorial service by bringing up Andrew's misdemeanours. This was a day when we remembered HRH The Duke of Edinburgh, it was a day when friends and family could gather and pay their respects, something they couldn't do during the pandemic. I find it quite distasteful that the media chose to taint the day by harping on about Andrew.
Much as we abhor his actions in the past he has literally had to pay for them and it's time to move on. Ultimately he is Philip's son and he had every right to be there to honour his father.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14190
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Fair Comment Foxy, but I also agree with Ken’s point…”I really don't know what the Queen or her advisors were thinking, she is usually much more media savvy than this”.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

I think it tells you more about the media than the Queen.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Topic author
Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17774
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Stephen »

Onelife wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 10:08
Fair Comment Foxy, but I also agree with Ken’s point…”I really don't know what the Queen or her advisors were thinking, she is usually much more media savvy than this”.

Your treading on dangerous ground mentioning the Queen in that tone Keefy old chap. People have died for less :)


CaroleF
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2184
Joined: January 2013
Location: Hampshire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by CaroleF »

If the Queen wanted Andrew to accompany her from Windsor and help her walk towards her seat then that is what should happen. Who are we to say she should have been more media savvy on the day that she attends her husband's memorial service with most of her immediate family? If it hadn't been what she wanted it wouldn't have happened. I'd like to see any of her advisors tell her she couldn't have Andrew by her side if that's what she wanted. She's obeyed all the rules set by the Government as far as media restrictions are concerned. We've only to look back to the picture of her at Prince Philip's funeral, this was her day, executed in the way she wanted.

Carole

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Her Maj is a long serving Monarch who has devoted her life to Service and Duty, at the very least she deserves understanding and respect from everybody on such a day.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

I don’t know what the media have been saying about this, as I haven’t looked.

Personally, I think the role of escorting the Queen would have fallen more naturally to Charles, as her eldest child. Seeing Andrew in such a prominent role seemed rather jarring after what’s happened
Gill

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Her late husband, her son, her choice, her business and no-one else's is my view. No-one other than Andrew and his accuser know the full truth of what happened years ago. He has paid the price, literally, and is condemned in many of the publics' eyes. Maybe she, as any mother probably would, is prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt and believe his version of events.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Onelife wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 10:08
Fair Comment Foxy, but I also agree with Ken’s point…”I really don't know what the Queen or her advisors were thinking, she is usually much more media savvy than this”.
She might be the Queen first and foremost, to us, but she is mainly a mother to her children, and Andrew has always been her favourite, and personally I thought there was nothing wrong with him escorting and helping her into the Abbey.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

I saw nothing wrong with Andrew escorting her.
Time to move on or is he going to be stalked for the rest of his days by a tawdry Press whose only interest is in selling papers? He has had his personal life exposed to all and sundry in the media; he has settled the claims against him and has been humiliatingly stripped of all of his military titles, yet still the media hound him. Of course this doesn't just affect Andrew (whom I agree has been exceptionally foolish and gets no sympathy from me) but I ask what the Queen and his daughters must feel when they continue to see headlines such as those.
Give the man and his family a break or are the Press going to squeal every time the man puts his head above the parapet. It's done now.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Perhaps the Queen's chose Andrew in her knowledge that this is his last ' Royal ' role ?
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Manoverboard wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 12:07
Perhaps the Queen's chose Andrew in her knowledge that this is his last ' Royal ' role ?
If some 'royal insiders' are to be believed then it appears queenie may be about to bestow new honours on Andy.
Depending on what, when and how, that could be a PR disaster that substantially forwards the republican agenda.
Last edited by Kendhni on 30 Mar 2022, 13:00, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14190
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

towny44 wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 11:48
Onelife wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 10:08
Fair Comment Foxy, but I also agree with Ken’s point…”I really don't know what the Queen or her advisors were thinking, she is usually much more media savvy than this”.
She might be the Queen first and foremost, to us, but she is mainly a mother to her children, and Andrew has always been her favourite, and personally I thought there was nothing wrong with him escorting and helping her into the Abbey.
I have already agreed with Foxy’s comments regarding Andrew’s attendance; however, the Royals were bloody foolish if they couldn’t foresee which way the media would take it with the Queen propping up her son.

Long live the Queen and then let’s be done with the lot of them :clap:

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

I don't actually think the Queen gives a tuppenny fig what the media think about it. It just exposes what a scandal mongering tribe of hypocrites they are who will do anything to sell a paper.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Onelife wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 14:05
... the Royals were bloody foolish if they couldn’t foresee which way the media would take it with the Queen propping up her son.
Based on the comments on the news this morning, several royals had raised concerns about this prior to the service ... that would imply that it was planned. However on another news channel it was reported as unplanned; and on yet another it was reported that Andy took it on himself to provide an arm to mumsy.

All-in-all, as I started by saying, it is a shame that whatever led up to this obvious PR fubar, it has over shadowed the real reason for the service.

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

oldbluefox wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 14:12
I don't actually think the Queen gives a tuppenny fig what the media think about it. It just exposes what a scandal mongering tribe of hypocrites they are who will do anything to sell a paper.
Are you talking about the royals or the media there :)

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14190
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

There are those who believe the Royal family is full of hypocrites which is why they draw so much attention on themselves. :think:

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Kendhni wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 14:15
oldbluefox wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 14:12
I don't actually think the Queen gives a tuppenny fig what the media think about it. It just exposes what a scandal mongering tribe of hypocrites they are who will do anything to sell a paper.
Are you talking about the royals or the media there :)
Sorry for the confusion. I didn't realise the Queen sold newspapers 🙂
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

oldbluefox wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 14:35
Kendhni wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 14:15
oldbluefox wrote: 30 Mar 2022, 14:12
I don't actually think the Queen gives a tuppenny fig what the media think about it. It just exposes what a scandal mongering tribe of hypocrites they are who will do anything to sell a paper.
Are you talking about the royals or the media there :)
Sorry for the confusion. I didn't realise the Queen sold newspapers 🙂
I think Ken might be confusing the Queen with big Betty his big issue seller. :lol:
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

Return to “General Chat”