If anyone is having problems logging in and is getting the following message:

"The submitted form was invalid. Try submitting again"

Then try clearing your browser cache

Current Affairs

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

oldbluefox wrote: 03 May 2022, 11:02
I was merely interested whom you would replace Boris with, that's all, but if you don't want to answer it just say so instead of going around the houses.
And I thought it was a very good question and worthy of discussion.
But, as I mentioned, I have already given my thoughts on this matter on several occasions previously, so it would be nice to actually hear other people's thoughts on the matter as well. If you are genuine in your desire to discuss then I am genuinely interested to hear your choice.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Refresh my memory. What did you say?
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Kendhni wrote: 03 May 2022, 12:16
Manoverboard wrote: 03 May 2022, 11:15
Kendhni wrote: 03 May 2022, 10:24

That would be the definition if you called the person a strawman (which I have never done), I have always (or at least always tried) to make it clear that it is the argument I am referring to using the definition
"an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument."

Now that we have got that out of the way and it is clear I am not using it as an insult then we can move on.
It isn't at all clear ...

If I read the content below, taken from #15379 as an example, I can take the view that strawmen comments can be read as an insult even if you say otherwise. Usual ilk sets the tone maybe ?

" ... and as usual all I got back from the usual ilk with nothing worthwhile to say were ad hominems, strawmen and infantile 'whataboutery'.". So that would be QED "

I consider the above to be a potential violation of Forum Rule 1b regarding ' harmony on the site '.

Regards MobyModPlod
Simple reading is clear that I am not referring to the 'usual ilk' as strawmen, but instead what I 'got back' was strawmen (unless of course you are able to send me the 'the usual ilk' by ParcelForce).
But now that we have cleared it up I will (do my best) to use 'strawman argument' to make it totally clear ... if I forget the 'argument' bit then please moderate it in.
Surely anyone using strawman is guilty of sexism?
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

towny44 wrote: 03 May 2022, 12:33
Surely anyone using strawman is guilty of sexism?
Can an argument have a gender?

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

oldbluefox wrote: 03 May 2022, 12:32
Refresh my memory. What did you say?
You would have to read back a few pages on this thread.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Since you gave the answer it would be much quicker and easier if you just told us. But if you don't want to then that's fine. Just say so.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

oldbluefox wrote: 03 May 2022, 12:40
Since you gave the answer it would be much quicker and easier if you just told us. But if you don't want to then that's fine. Just say so.
It would be nice to hear others peoples thought first. Some people have accused me of trying to force my opinion on them, I am trying to give them a chance to provide their opinion first (and maybe even influence my thoughts). Anyone with a genuine interest can easily go back and find mine, but I am sure everyone that is interested in the subject would also like to hear other peoples thoughts on the matter

Maybe I, and you, are wrong and there is absolutely no genuine interest in who could/should replace Johnson ... I really do not know what they are scared of.
Last edited by Kendhni on 03 May 2022, 13:13, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Kendhni wrote: 03 May 2022, 13:10
I really do not know what they are scared of.
Me neither. But if they don't want to answer they will prevaricate till the cows come home. :problem: :angel:
Last edited by oldbluefox on 03 May 2022, 13:25, edited 1 time in total.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

I agree it is sad that you haven't found anyone, apart from me, interested in joining in your discussion. I would have thought that anyone with a genuine interest in the topic would be willing to break the ice to stop the prevarication.

I remember in one of my college courses one of the case studies was a bit similar. Sometimes it is down to be people being too scared to have an opinion without checking it out with the group first. I have never understood the fear of being a true individual with their own opinion.

Sadly I fear the only answer you are getting is my answer ... which is a few pages back. But if you go back a little further you will find an answer from another poster as well.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Don't worry about it Ken. I understand.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

oldbluefox wrote: 03 May 2022, 13:38
Don't worry about it Ken. I understand.
Some people just genuinely have no self awareness of how boring they are 😂
I just skip through anything he’s posted.
I’d recommend similar Foxy.
Last edited by barney on 03 May 2022, 14:25, edited 1 time in total.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Good lesson learnt Barney. God loves a trier.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14188
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

To be fair to Foxy, the only reason I haven’t given an opinion is because every time I say “bring back Theresa” members just take the p*ss out of me :shock: :)

Michael Gove stands head and shoulders above any of the other circus performers and would have made a fantastic PM in my opinion.

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

It is nice to see you starting the discussion, Onelife. You are the only other poster I could think of that had already suggested an alternative.
There is now no excuse for the originator of the question not to express their opinion as well ... I look forward to reading it.
Last edited by Kendhni on 03 May 2022, 14:57, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17037
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Bensham33 wrote: 02 May 2022, 23:02
I think he's somewhere in the middle. I don't know what shade of red that is. As for the rest if it I don't really understand where you are coming from. What do you mean he's not even grey, that doesn't make sense. He's the leader of the Opposition who's job is to hold the government to account and he's doing a good job of You've been told before, if you want to know what that....if you want to know what Labour stand for look at their web site. If you want to know more about Starmer Google him..... I don't know what else to say perhaps your really clever and brainy and I'm thick and stupid and getting completely the wrong idea of what you are talking about but I think we have to wait for a General election to see what Labour really stand for we should wait to judge Sir Keir when and if he becomes Prime Minister.
Thank you for at least giving an opinion. More than the other Hindsight fans can be bothered to do, or even the man himself. I don't think you're thick at all but I wouldn't give you a job as an election strategist. The great mass of the electorate will not study Google or the Labour website. They need to be spoon fed with soundbites and a solid picture of what the people they're voting for stand for. It's no good waiting for Sir H to be elected to find our who he is. Or even the election campaign. Opinions are formed over a long time.

What I mean by grey is we don't know him. Like John Major. I don't know if you're old enough to remember his Spitting Image puppet. Shades of grey and only memorable quote was "more peas Norma." No doubt a nice man but not an election winner.

Election winners have a clear image. Love them or hate them Thatcher and Blair had clear images and won repeated elections. Even your hated Boris set out clearly what he stood for, Get Brexit Done, and trounced the opposition.

Even on the big issue still for some, Brexit, we haven't a clue where Sir H stands. Will he try to reverse it? Will he make it work better?

Being Not Boris is not enough. It's likely all the party leaders at the next election will not be Boris. It's not enough to hold the government to account. You have to offer a credible alternative. He doesn't.

I know why he's reluctant to define himself. If he's Corbynite he will alienate a large chunk of the electorate. If he's Blairite he will alienate a chunk.of his party and his union paymasters. Party funders expecting something in return? The Tories are amateurs in that field.

If he's somewhere in the middle as you put it, 5 on my Corbyn/Blair scale, he has half a chance. I reckon he needs to be at least a 7 to be more certain. We usually elect centrist governments these days. But he needs to have the balls to tell us sooner rather than later.

A final thought on his greyness verging on invisibility. Have I Got News For You on the BBC is usually anti whichever government is in power, so they've hammered Boris. Last week they had a picture of Sir H and Angela Rayner, on which one of the panelists commented "ah yes, that's the leader of the Labour Party and her deputy". Says it all.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14188
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

barney wrote: 03 May 2022, 14:24
oldbluefox wrote: 03 May 2022, 13:38
Don't worry about it Ken. I understand.

Some people just genuinely have no self awareness of how boring they are 😂

I just skip through anything he’s posted.
I’d recommend similar Foxy.
Stephen will be devastated to hear that :lol: :angel:

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 03 May 2022, 15:01
... I don't know if you're old enough to remember his Spitting Image puppet. Shades of grey and only memorable quote was "more peas Norma." No doubt a nice man but not an election winner.
Is that right. For years I have done an impression of that impression but I say " Peas are nice dear ", I still say it to Mobietta on those rare occasions that we actually have them.

ps ... guess what; tonight it's Scampi, Chips 'n' Petite Pois Peas :lol:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5853
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 03 May 2022, 15:01
Bensham33 wrote: 02 May 2022, 23:02
I think he's somewhere in the middle. I don't know what shade of red that is. As for the rest if it I don't really understand where you are coming from. What do you mean he's not even grey, that doesn't make sense. He's the leader of the Opposition who's job is to hold the government to account and he's doing a good job of You've been told before, if you want to know what that....if you want to know what Labour stand for look at their web site. If you want to know more about Starmer Google him..... I don't know what else to say perhaps your really clever and brainy and I'm thick and stupid and getting completely the wrong idea of what you are talking about but I think we have to wait for a General election to see what Labour really stand for we should wait to judge Sir Keir when and if he becomes Prime Minister.
Thank you for at least giving an opinion. More than the other Hindsight fans can be bothered to do, or even the man himself. I don't think you're thick at all but I wouldn't give you a job as an election strategist. The great mass of the electorate will not study Google or the Labour website. They need to be spoon fed with soundbites and a solid picture of what the people they're voting for stand for. It's no good waiting for Sir H to be elected to find our who he is. Or even the election campaign. Opinions are formed over a long time.

What I mean by grey is we don't know him. Like John Major. I don't know if you're old enough to remember his Spitting Image puppet. Shades of grey and only memorable quote was "more peas Norma." No doubt a nice man but not an election winner.

Election winners have a clear image. Love them or hate them Thatcher and Blair had clear images and won repeated elections. Even your hated Boris set out clearly what he stood for, Get Brexit Done, and trounced the opposition.

Even on the big issue still for some, Brexit, we haven't a clue where Sir H stands. Will he try to reverse it? Will he make it work better?

Being Not Boris is not enough. It's likely all the party leaders at the next election will not be Boris. It's not enough to hold the government to account. You have to offer a credible alternative. He doesn't.

I know why he's reluctant to define himself. If he's Corbynite he will alienate a large chunk of the electorate. If he's Blairite he will alienate a chunk.of his party and his union paymasters. Party funders expecting something in return? The Tories are amateurs in that field.

If he's somewhere in the middle as you put it, 5 on my Corbyn/Blair scale, he has half a chance. I reckon he needs to be at least a 7 to be more certain. We usually elect centrist governments these days. But he needs to have the balls to tell us sooner rather than later.

A final thought on his greyness verging on invisibility. Have I Got News For You on the BBC is usually anti whichever government is in power, so they've hammered Boris. Last week they had a picture of Sir H and Angela Rayner, on which one of the panelists commented "ah yes, that's the leader of the Labour Party and her deputy". Says it all.
As our resident leftie, I fear you have hit the nail on the head there Merv.
I didn’t really want Starmer, I preferred Nandy.
Far more authentic and untarnished by Brexit.
However, Starmer won and has now had plenty of time to establish his place.
I don’t expect a detailed manifesto at this stage of the cycle but do expect clear blue water between the policies.
Starmer needs to be telling us why it would be better under him, not just being not Boris Johnson.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9670
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

I think I did offer my choice to Ken very early on in the debate, but because I felt that all possible candidates were inferior to Boris in the most important attribute, winning an election, I preferred to stay with Boris. Somehow he was not prepared to accept my choice.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Kendhni wrote: 03 May 2022, 14:57
It is nice to see you starting the discussion, Onelife. You are the only other poster I could think of that had already suggested an alternative.
There is now no excuse for the originator of the question not to express their opinion as well ... I look forward to reading it.
Keefy did much better than you Ken. See how easy that was......
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

Onelife wrote: 03 May 2022, 14:46
To be fair to Foxy, the only reason I haven’t given an opinion is because every time I say “bring back Theresa” members just take the p*ss out of me :shock: :)

Michael Gove stands head and shoulders above any of the other circus performers and would have made a fantastic PM in my opinion.
Kendhni wrote: 03 May 2022, 14:57
It is nice to see you starting the discussion, Onelife. You are the only other poster I could think of that had already suggested an alternative.
There is now no excuse for the originator of the question not to express their opinion as well ... I look forward to reading it.
As the conversation has now got going, I would say Tom Tugendhat, as (at the moment at least) he appears untainted by the current government circus
Gill

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

towny44 wrote: 03 May 2022, 15:51
I think I did offer my choice to Ken very early on in the debate, but because I felt that all possible candidates were inferior to Boris in the most important attribute, winning an election, I preferred to stay with Boris. Somehow he was not prepared to accept my choice.
I must have missed that post in among all the dross that I and others have been generating today. If so, I apologise.

I think a lot of people will stick with Johnson because they feel some sort of loyalty to him, but not necessarily because they think he is the best candidate. I am intrigued at your reason about 'winning an election' (**) surely there must be other election winning talent in the Tory party?


(**) BTW, I sort of agree with you about Johnson ... he truly is the comeback kid (if he gets through his current problems and doesn't suffer huge losses this week, then he could well be leading the Torys into the next election)

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

oldbluefox wrote: 03 May 2022, 16:15
Kendhni wrote: 03 May 2022, 14:57
It is nice to see you starting the discussion, Onelife. You are the only other poster I could think of that had already suggested an alternative.
There is now no excuse for the originator of the question not to express their opinion as well ... I look forward to reading it.
Keefy did much better than you Ken. See how easy that was......
I know it is easy, which is why I gave my opinion weeks/months ago.
I am surprised that the originator appears to be the only one having difficulty in answering the question.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12538
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

That's right Ken. You did give your opinion and it was very significant.
Now go and play nicely.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

oldbluefox wrote: 03 May 2022, 16:30
That's right Ken. You did give your opinion and it was very significant.
Now go and play nicely.
Harmony is key ... right :thumbup:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

Return to “General Chat”