Current Affairs

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

david63 wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 12:57
Kendhni wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 12:49
Could be the next chancellor
Sunak?????
That would be an interesting possibility ... although Truss will probably want someone that she can control.
At the current rate I think every tory member will have had the opportunity to be a chancellor before the next election ... 4 chancellors in a year. :lol: :lol:
Last edited by Kendhni on 14 Oct 2022, 13:04, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Simon Clark??

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17021
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Good to see some plain talking honesty without ifs and buts from some members, thank you Barney and Bensham.

Whether or not I agree with you I can respect a clear view. Better than waiting till the outcome and then moaning as has become the norm from some.

Including Sir H, but he does seem to have come up with a few policies since "Not Boris" was no longer enough.

I'm intrigued to see what financial proposals he might come up with though, given he was quoted as saying he would support most of the budget. It was mostly the 45% tax issue he disagreed with and that's gone.

As a floating voter my cross at the next election remains undecided. He still has more to do to convince me.
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 14 Oct 2022, 13:20, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14166
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Back to the same old, same old fiscal policies that have led us to where we are now? I’ve heard the saying “be careful what you wish for” cast in my direction on several occasions so I will turn that around and just say this…. If we carry on trying to tweak fiscal policy in the direction that political analysts/media think it should go we really should be careful what we wish for.

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Onelife wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 13:46
Back to the same old, same old fiscal policies that have led us to where we are now? I’ve heard the saying “be careful what you wish for” cast in my direction on several occasions so I will turn that around and just say this…. If we carry on trying to tweak fiscal policy in the direction that political analysts/media think it should go we really should be careful what we wish for.
Very possible, but is now the right time for major changes? I agree that significant change is needed but that has to wait until the economy has the room to manoeuvre. Maybe slow and steady is better for the current climate ... but start bringing in those big ideas at the earliest?

Anyway it appears that a bottle of Fairy Liquid lasts longer than 3 tory chancellors. :)
Last edited by Kendhni on 14 Oct 2022, 13:53, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14166
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Gill W wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 12:53
Looks like I was wrong about Kwarteng being toast by the end of the day. I should have said by the end of lunch!

But he was implementing Truss’s policy, they were in it together. Surely, she should go as well
barney wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 12:40

I do 👍
He’s playing a blinder at the moment and has put together a half decent shadow cabinet.
He’s certainly got some talented people in his shadow cabinet.
I’ll take your word for that Gill but he also has a lot of dead wood which will be looking for top positions…. just think of it… Angela Raynor as Chancellor with Emily Thornbury as home secretary :lol: :lol:
Last edited by Onelife on 14 Oct 2022, 14:03, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14166
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

So, it’s Hunt for Chancellor with Rishi not far behind him I suspect?

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 13:13
Good to see some plain talking honesty without ifs and buts from some members, thank you Barney and Bensham.

Whether or not I agree with you I can respect a clear view. Better than waiting till the outcome and then moaning as has become the norm from some.

Including Sir H, but he does seem to have come up with a few policies since "Not Boris" was no longer enough.

I'm intrigued to see what financial proposals he might come up with though, given he was quoted as saying he would support most of the budget. It was mostly the 45% tax issue he disagreed with and that's gone.

As a floating voter my cross at the next election remains undecided. He still has more to do to convince me.
I actually feel quite sorry for my local MP Selaine Saxby because she is a good, honest local person who has the best interest of her constituents at heart.
I emailed her when Johnson was in charge imploring her to distance herself from the lying toad because of guilt by association.
She sent be a very nice but somewhat cryptic personal reply.
I’ve spoken with her many times during the beach clean but have always avoided politics.
Not the time and not the place.
She will probably lose her job through no fault of her own.
That’s the game I suppose.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Onelife wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 13:59
Gill W wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 12:53
Looks like I was wrong about Kwarteng being toast by the end of the day. I should have said by the end of lunch!

But he was implementing Truss’s policy, they were in it together. Surely, she should go as well
barney wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 12:40

I do 👍
He’s playing a blinder at the moment and has put together a half decent shadow cabinet.
He’s certainly got some talented people in his shadow cabinet.
I’ll take your word for that Gill but he also has a lot of dead wood which will be looking for top positions…. just think of it… Angela Raynor as Chancellor with Emily Thornbury as home secretary :lol: :lol:
That won’t happen mate.
Raynor is an elected role by the Party without portfolio and Thornbury will be Attorney General at best.
Starmer can clearly read the room.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14166
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Kendhni wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 13:53
Onelife wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 13:46
Back to the same old, same old fiscal policies that have led us to where we are now? I’ve heard the saying “be careful what you wish for” cast in my direction on several occasions so I will turn that around and just say this…. If we carry on trying to tweak fiscal policy in the direction that political analysts/media think it should go we really should be careful what we wish for.
Very possible, but is now the right time for major changes? I agree that significant change is needed but that has to wait until the economy has the room to manoeuvre. Maybe slow and steady is better for the current climate ... but start bringing in those big ideas at the earliest?

Anyway it appears that a bottle of Fairy Liquid lasts longer than 3 tory chancellors. :)
Turn back the clock three weeks and I would say yes, but clearly there was a timing issue with how they went about it.

User avatar

Ray B
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3545
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Ray B »

So, did she finish her statement Q&A because of the quality of questions as no one asked how the economy is, etc, and what effect she is making on it.
Don't worry, be happy

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Ray B wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 14:46
So, did she finish her statement Q&A because of the quality of questions as no one asked how the economy is, etc, and what effect she is making on it.
She was well advised Ray.

Less said the better .

I did take enjoyment from how she totally ignored Beth Rigby from Sky News :lol:
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17021
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

I liked the way she emphasised Robert Peston's name. Very definitely Pest-on.

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

That was a shockingly bad press conference. You could hear her going 'ummmm' as she scanned the room, desperately looking for someone who wouldn't ask a question that was too difficult (which was why she ignored Beth Rigby. If she can't deal with a reporter, how are we to believe that she would deal with Putin.

I don't see how Truss survives this
Gill

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14166
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 15:12
I liked the way she emphasised Robert Peston's name. Very definitely Pest-on.
She was certainly on the right track because he definitely Pests-me-off

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14166
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Gill W wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 15:17
That was a shockingly bad press conference. You could hear her going 'ummmm' as she scanned the room, desperately looking for someone who wouldn't ask a question that was too difficult (which was why she ignored Beth Rigby. If she can't deal with a reporter, how are we to believe that she would deal with Putin.

I don't see how Truss survives this
Best avoid rabid hounds who’s only interest is to prise out headline stories in order that they can move on to their next political victim.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17021
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Not being in the room I have no idea who she did or didn't ignore. Others clearly had a better view.

However the questions asked were the usual inane rubbish designed to score points rather than elicit any useful information. I don't know why they bothered. Could the dreadful Rigby have been any worse? Actually don't answer that. Among pitiful hacks she's one of the worst.

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Gill W wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 15:17
That was a shockingly bad press conference. You could hear her going 'ummmm' as she scanned the room, desperately looking for someone who wouldn't ask a question that was too difficult (which was why she ignored Beth Rigby. If she can't deal with a reporter, how are we to believe that she would deal with Putin.
I like Rigby, she asks the tough questions that weaker journalists avoid ... if that annoys tribal light weights then that is even better.
Truss is no match for Putain ... so let's hope she does not have to square up to him.
I don't see how Truss survives this
She is no Johnson, so she cannot rely on gullibility and bluster.

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 15:53
Not being in the room I have no idea who she did or didn't ignore. Others clearly had a better view.

However the questions asked were the usual inane rubbish designed to score points rather than elicit any useful information. I don't know why they bothered. Could the dreadful Rigby have been any worse? Actually don't answer that. Among pitiful hacks she's one of the worst.
You didn't miss much. The press conference lasted 8 minutes and Truss took 4 questions before she scuttled off

For a major policy U turn and a sacking of a chancellor, it might be expected that there was more substance.

That's why I think she can't survive this.

Can't believe that people find Beth Rigby to be more of a talking point ! :lol:
Gill

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

Onelife wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 13:59
… Angela Raynor as Chancellor with Emily Thornbury as home secretary :lol: :lol:
I dunno, the current lot have set the bar so low that a snail could hurdle over it. :lol:

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10934
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by david63 »

Let's hope Hunt does a better job at the Treasury than he did with the NHS

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17021
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Gill W wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 16:09
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 15:53
Not being in the room I have no idea who she did or didn't ignore. Others clearly had a better view.

However the questions asked were the usual inane rubbish designed to score points rather than elicit any useful information. I don't know why they bothered. Could the dreadful Rigby have been any worse? Actually don't answer that. Among pitiful hacks she's one of the worst.
You didn't miss much. The press conference lasted 8 minutes and Truss took 4 questions before she scuttled off

For a major policy U turn and a sacking of a chancellor, it might be expected that there was more substance.

That's why I think she can't survive this.

Can't believe that people find Beth Rigby to be more of a talking point ! :lol:
Sorry, I meant I only saw it on TV, not present personally. My view didn't include Beth Rigby.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17021
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

david63 wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 16:12
Let's hope Hunt does a better job at the Treasury than he did with the NHS
Quite. I wouldn't trust him with my grandchildren's pocket money.

Bring back Boris and Rishi. :)

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17021
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Oddly the BBC are saying she took questions from 3 journalists, rather than the 4 we heard.

Sounds like their arithmetic is worse than hers!

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Kendhni »

david63 wrote: 14 Oct 2022, 16:12
Let's hope Hunt does a better job at the Treasury than he did with the NHS
Let's see what he has to say first ... it's like chancellors have become more disposable than diapers ... just less environmentally friendly :)
I wonder what the odds are of u-turn betty making it to Christmas?

Return to “General Chat”