Onelife wrote: 01 Nov 2022, 15:16
Re: Kens post 17794
I did indeed mean ECHR…the very body that make it very difficult to remove/prosecute terrorists… without costing the country millions in legal fees. the laws that don’t allow free speech for fear of offending, the laws that every member country should try and adhere to but don’t. the laws that allow women to be subservient to their cultural masters. Laws that have done little to improve the living standards of the poorest in society, laws that protect the rights of illegal immigrants.
But overall the ECHR has greatly helped to improve the standard of living for the majority. Yes, some will focus on the exceptions, but we have to be careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water.
Truss was recognising the need to attract migrants that can add value to our ecomny, not encourage those who come here to become a recipient of our overstretched bennift system.
About 75% of asylum seekers are deemed, by the British government, to have met the criteria required for refugee status for up to 5 years. Truss was correct in what she was doing, it is Cruella that wants to tar all asylum seekers with the same brush ... as I said, she has no interest in resolution, just punishment. For example, It costs about £25K to support a refuge doctor in the UK, or £250K top train one.
There is a myth that it is the benefit system that attracts asylum seekers. That is incorrect, the majority know nothing about the benefits system in the UK. In fact the UK is not even one of the more attractive destinations when it comes to benefits ... under the UK system most asylum seekers are not allowed to work in the UK and therefore it is the government that makes them dependent on the state (and live on less than £6 per day). The main attraction is that most can speak some English and many have family members here already.
The UK is home to less than 1% of the worlds refugees.
Decisive action…will always struggle in a political system that works against itself. The millions which are being sent to Albania is a result of indecisive action perpetrated by the opposition party.
It has little to do with the opposition party. The opposition may disagree and may fight it but the government has a clear majority and therefore any failure is because they are unable to get legislation through their own ranks. In this case the opposition is correct ... the government just refuses to recognise that the only way to solve this is to open up safe/legal routes for migrants and asylum seekers ... closing them down is what has made the problem worse.