Current Affairs

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

towny44 wrote: 30 Dec 2022, 18:21
Whilst I do tend to support the idea of an elected upper chamber, I do have reservations about who should be on the ballot, and why would this need to be done via PR, unless you want the upper chamber to be a mirror of the lower chamber, except it would give the minor parties a much larger number of seats. Can you imagine what an upper chamber full oF Scots Nationalists would be like.
That's precisely what I want. And actually on PR the SNP would have fewer seats. On first the post they have most of the Scottish seats. On PR they'd have less than half.
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 30 Dec 2022, 19:59, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 30 Dec 2022, 19:59
towny44 wrote: 30 Dec 2022, 18:21
Whilst I do tend to support the idea of an elected upper chamber, I do have reservations about who should be on the ballot, and why would this need to be done via PR, unless you want the upper chamber to be a mirror of the lower chamber, except it would give the minor parties a much larger number of seats. Can you imagine what an upper chamber full oF Scots Nationalists would be like.
That's precisely what I want. And actually on PR the SNP would have fewer seats. On first the post they have most of the Scottish seats. On PR they'd have less than half.
Unfortunately Merv most of the smaller parties are left leaning, this would lead to an upper chamber which could, and probably would, result in them blocking or amending any right wing legislation that any future Tory govt wanted to pass.
Last edited by towny44 on 30 Dec 2022, 20:44, edited 1 time in total.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

That's democracy.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 30 Dec 2022, 21:12
That's democracy.
Yes, but it's the most concerning element of applying PR to a democracy, especially a country steeped in the 2 party system. It will take us years to work out a suitable democratic way of mitigating the worst effects of PR.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10929
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by david63 »

Does anyone else think that $200 million a year is an obscene amount to pay anyone, let alone a "prima-donna" footballer?

User avatar

Topic author
Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17750
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Stephen »

Absolutely.

They should be giving me half.

User avatar

Topic author
Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17750
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Stephen »

I see I was missed yet again in the New Year honours list.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

It doesn't concern me at all how much anybody else earns unless I'm contributing to it.

You'll always find somebody who has an axe to grind about other folks' earnings / pensions / perks etc
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

david63 wrote: 31 Dec 2022, 07:17
Does anyone else think that $200 million a year is an obscene amount to pay anyone, let alone a "prima-donna" footballer?
I would say yes David, if nothing else it compounds the apathy and an acceptance that for the majority of low paid workers there are two planets on which we live.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Onelife wrote: 31 Dec 2022, 10:30
david63 wrote: 31 Dec 2022, 07:17
Does anyone else think that $200 million a year is an obscene amount to pay anyone, let alone a "prima-donna" footballer?
I would say yes David, if nothing else it compounds the apathy and an acceptance that for the majority of low paid workers there are two planets on which we live.
I have always accepted that for services you are paid what the market and the quality of your work will bear. Footballers or train drivers your salary depends on how much you are worth to your employer.
I do agree with the view that football clubs have spent far too much of the billions they receive from television rights on player wages. Unfortunately that boat has sailed and it seems that player wages will continue to climb, just as long asTV rights do the same.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000


Bensham33
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 706
Joined: October 2020

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Bensham33 »

If our MP's were on Premier League wages then I believe that some real talent might be attracted to Parliament just like they used to be. Then perhaps we might be able to sort out some of the problems that we face as a country. Because one things for certain non of our politicians are capable of doing it.
Up the Palace

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10929
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by david63 »

Moved to new topic here
Last edited by david63 on 04 Jan 2023, 13:39, edited 1 time in total.

Return to “General Chat”