Is the Law Right?

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Topic author
david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10929
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Is the Law Right?

Unread post by david63 »

Without going into the details as to whether the verdict was right or wrong Kevin Spacey has been found not guilty of nine sex offences but his four accusers are now legally entitled to lifelong anonymity.

If accusers are entitled to anonymity then the accused should also be entitled to anonymity until proven guilty or if the accused is named then so should the accusers.

One person's life/reputation is ruined but apparently liars can walk free with no redress.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Is the Law Right?

Unread post by Manoverboard »

No it isn't right ... no names revealed either side else all names should be in the open. It is more practical to opt for the latter of course.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17750
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Is the Law Right?

Unread post by Stephen »

Personally I reckon he’s guilty as sin, but money talks.
Last edited by Stephen on 26 Jul 2023, 16:54, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: Is the Law Right?

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

david63 wrote: 26 Jul 2023, 15:27
Without going into the details as to whether the verdict was right or wrong Kevin Spacey has been found not guilty of nine sex offences but his four accusers are now legally entitled to lifelong anonymity.

If accusers are entitled to anonymity then the accused should also be entitled to anonymity until proven guilty or if the accused is named then so should the accusers.

One person's life/reputation is ruined but apparently liars can walk free with no redress.
That's how it used to be, correctly in my mind. It was changed to encourage gold diggers witnesses to come forward.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Is the Law Right?

Unread post by Onelife »

Stephen wrote: 26 Jul 2023, 16:53
Personally I reckon he’s guilty as sin, but money talks.
The question of ”Innocent until proven guilty” is Imo where the system fails to see justice done in many cases. It’s a strange judicial process when 9 jurors can find a person guilty, yet two who chose for whatever reason can allow the guilty to walk free.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Is the Law Right?

Unread post by towny44 »

Stephen wrote: 26 Jul 2023, 16:53
Personally I reckon he’s guilty as sin, but money talks.
I dont think he has been shown to have a nice personality, but if his "partners" did not like his manners they were free to walk away, but I wonder if it was his money that kept them close.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Ray B
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3544
Joined: January 2013

Re: Is the Law Right?

Unread post by Ray B »

I think Merv hit the nail when he mention gold diggers.
Trouble is, when accused and then found innocent, some times the sh@t sticks and could hinder your professional future.
Don't worry, be happy

Return to “General Chat”