Onelife wrote: 16 Dec 2023, 16:28
Slapstick wrote: 16 Dec 2023, 15:20
Ray Scully wrote: 16 Dec 2023, 12:07
Well given that he served for 10 years in the army including two tours of Afghanistan and is prepared to take on the press barons rather than being bought off as allegedly his brother was. I don’t think the comments of a few keyboard warriors will upset him
"Allegedly" says it all.
Just like Harry's alledged claims against the press, this judgement is not proof but only based on probability.
He's claiming victory, but of his 33 claims he was successful on only 15, so that suggests the Mirror group were successful on the other 18?
He's nothing more than a royal sponger, who despite all his grievances continues to use his title as a money earner.
Unfurtunatly “allegedly” is as close as you will ever get to the Royal Freeloading Monarchy…as witnessed on many occasions…whether it be tax evasion, money for titles or the odd infidelity claim….Yes’ slapstick, based on probability they “The working Royals”

are allowed to get away with the biggest cons in history.
And the difference between Harry and the Monarchy is?
Harry and her uses the press when it suits, mostly to promote themselves for personal gain, when they go against them the toys come out the pram, they can't have it both ways but they seem to think they can.
If they really want nothing to do with the royal family fair enough, relinquish their royal titles and cut all ties simple, but we all know they won't do that.
The Monarchy are the complete opposite.