child cruelty

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Topic author
gilly88
Second Officer
Second Officer
Posts: 271
Joined: January 2013

child cruelty

Unread post by gilly88 »

I was appalled this morning to pass a popular young girls accessory shop (claires?), and see a young mother holding her baby whilst the assistant prepared to pierce her little ears, the baby was certainly no more than six months old. is this not child cruelty? if not it certainly should be in my opinion the poor thing screamed the shopping centre down.
regards gilly.

User avatar

GillD46
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3364
Joined: January 2013
Location: Gower Peninsula, South Wales

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by GillD46 »

I know others may not agree, but personally, I hate to see children with pierced ears, much less babies. My niece had her son's ears pierced when he was tiny - I was horrified.
Gill

User avatar

Topic author
gilly88
Second Officer
Second Officer
Posts: 271
Joined: January 2013

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by gilly88 »

hi gill
it was also the fact that the baby was so beautiful and innocently smiling away, only to be assaulted two seconds later, it made me cringe to see it.
regards gilly.


Jacknian
Second Officer
Second Officer
Posts: 352
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cambridgeshire

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Jacknian »

I think it's disgusting to mutilate a poor baby's ears when they are too small to make their own decisions. Even worse than that I saw a baby on YouTube having a tattoo! This was in Slovakia and of course would be illegal in this country. I think it should be illegal for a child to have their ears pierced until they're at least 16. I think it looks really 'chavvy' anyway for a baby to have earrings ( controversial ? )

User avatar

Dancing Queen
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3819
Joined: January 2013
Location: Derbyshire

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Dancing Queen »

I wonder if there is an age limit and if it is even legal or is it just a case if the parent is there it is ok.

Personally I think there should be some sort of age limit maybe 16.
Jo

User avatar

Topic author
gilly88
Second Officer
Second Officer
Posts: 271
Joined: January 2013

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by gilly88 »

apparently there is no age limit :(
regards gilly.

User avatar

GillD46
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3364
Joined: January 2013
Location: Gower Peninsula, South Wales

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by GillD46 »

Dancing Queen wrote:
I wonder if there is an age limit and if it is even legal or is it just a case if the parent is there it is ok.

Personally I think there should be some sort of age limit maybe 16.
I agree, 16 seems about right.
Gill


Boris+
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3367
Joined: February 2013

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Boris+ »

Exactly - 16 years seems about right. There's nothing wrong with a nice bracelet or a locket or necklace, I think that any piercing should (like tattoos) have an age limit.

Poor little dab!

Em :)

User avatar

GillD46
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3364
Joined: January 2013
Location: Gower Peninsula, South Wales

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by GillD46 »

Necklaces of any description are not a good idea for young children as they can easily get caught and strangle them.
Gill

User avatar

Meg 50
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2362
Joined: January 2013
Location: sarf London

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Meg 50 »

my 2 nagged and nagged for their ears to be pierced - I said 13....
in the event all 3 of us were done on the same day - one 13, one 11 and one 40.

It was useful having set an age cos their cousin was nagging too and sil could tell her she had to wait until she was as old as mine!
Meg
x

User avatar

Kendhni
Ex Team Member
Posts: 6520
Joined: January 2013

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Kendhni »

The mother should be done for child abuse

User avatar

Jean W
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 526
Joined: January 2013
Location: Derbyshire

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Jean W »

I agree that that there should be an age limit - 16 sounds about right. At that age, they are making their own decisions.

User avatar

jay-ell71
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 892
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cotswolds

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by jay-ell71 »

No younger than 16. Babies with pierced ears look quite bizarre in my opinion, same as little girls wearing shoes with (high) heels.
Jay

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Manoverboard »

It is certainly not something that we would have agreed to at such an early age but I would wish to point out that many different civilised peoples from all around the World have very different ideas, customs and values to those that are being expressed so strongly here.

For example our Daughter in Law lives in the UK but is Galician, Spanish, and our Grand-Daughter was 8 when her ear was pierced but never in a month of Sundays would anybody convince me or any of our family that they were engaging in child abuse ... .

The parents should decide, however I do agree that there should be a minimum age of some sort albeit not 16.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being


Boris+
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3367
Joined: February 2013

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Boris+ »

Oh Gill,

I hadn't thought of danger with necklaces - well done you!

Em :)

User avatar

Meg 50
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2362
Joined: January 2013
Location: sarf London

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Meg 50 »

Manoverboard wrote:


The parents should decide, however I do agree that there should be a minimum age of some sort albeit not 16.
My younger daughter was about to go to Secondary school - so we got it sorted before the problems that come with not being allowed jewellry in PE at High school and not being able to remove the earrings for 6 weeks ( ish).
Meg
x

User avatar

Meg 50
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2362
Joined: January 2013
Location: sarf London

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by Meg 50 »

The things that worry me about tiny children having their ears pierced are:
1)keeping them clean
2) the children aren't big enough to deal with them alone. School and preschools aren't allowed to deal with studs that fall out during the day (and even if they were, have better things to do with the time)
Meg
x

User avatar

GillD46
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3364
Joined: January 2013
Location: Gower Peninsula, South Wales

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by GillD46 »

Boris+ wrote:
Oh Gill,

I hadn't thought of danger with necklaces - well done you!

Em :)
Many years ago, I nursed a young child brought in unconscious from strangling herself on a necklace - she ended up severely brain damaged.
Gill

User avatar

The Monocled Mutineer
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 470
Joined: July 2013

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by The Monocled Mutineer »

Gilly88,

It is truly appalling.

But then one can expect little else given some of the specimens of parenthood I see hanging around town centres with their disfigured offspring with their fags going, littering and f--k--g as every fifth word.

Derek Kane
TMM

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12531
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: child cruelty

Unread post by oldbluefox »

The Monocled Mutineer wrote:
Gilly88,
........ their disfigured offspring with their fags going, littering and f--k--g as every fifth word.

Derek Kane
I must admit I have never seen them smoking.
I was taught to be cautious

Return to “General Chat”