Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Topic author
Mo2013
I am banned
I am banned
Posts: 858
Joined: January 2013

Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Mo2013 »

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/1069071 ... x_charges/

What happened to innocent until proven guilty ?

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10936
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by david63 »

Not necessarily anything to do with innocent until proven guilty.

He may have asked/suggested that they be removed or it may be as a precaution against theft and/or damage.

User avatar

Dark Knight
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5119
Joined: January 2013
Location: East Hull

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Dark Knight »

should we take ours down, in case the neighbours get upset?
Nihil Obstat

User avatar

Topic author
Mo2013
I am banned
I am banned
Posts: 858
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Mo2013 »

david63 wrote:
Not necessarily anything to do with innocent until proven guilty.

He may have asked/suggested that they be removed or it may be as a precaution against theft and/or damage.
I got the impression that it was Cunard who thought it was 'appropriate' to remove them, rather than Rolf Harris asking/suggesting .....

User avatar

suespud
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1295
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by suespud »

Never thought about removing mine and wont be.
Whatever the outcome is, I love the piece of art we have by him and it will be staying put.


Ray Scully
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2069
Joined: January 2013
Location: Lancashire

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Ray Scully »

Dark Knight wrote:
should we take ours down, in case the neighbours get upset?


:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

User avatar

emjay45
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1192
Joined: April 2013
Location: Ellan Vannin

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by emjay45 »

Didn't Buckingham Palace give his portrait of the Queen back to the BBC who then mislaid it? I thought that was awful. No he hasn't been found guilty yet.

User avatar

Not so ancient mariner
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1806
Joined: February 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Not so ancient mariner »

What an artist may - or may not - have done, has for me no bearing on the artistic merit (or otherwise) of his/her work.

User avatar

Topic author
Mo2013
I am banned
I am banned
Posts: 858
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Mo2013 »

emjay45 wrote:
Didn't Buckingham Palace give his portrait of the Queen back to the BBC who then mislaid it? I thought that was awful. No he hasn't been found guilty yet.
Emjay, Yes I understand the portrait of the Queen had been removed, but I didn't know the Beeb had subsequently mislaid it. What are they going to do if he is found not guilty?

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10936
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by david63 »

Mo2013 wrote:
david63 wrote:
Not necessarily anything to do with innocent until proven guilty.

He may have asked/suggested that they be removed or it may be as a precaution against theft and/or damage.
I got the impression that it was Cunard who thought it was 'appropriate' to remove them, rather than Rolf Harris asking/suggesting .....
Although that was only what was reported in the media and as we all know the media do not always tell us the whole story - just the bits that sell newspapers.

User avatar

The Tinker
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1126
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by The Tinker »

Not so ancient mariner wrote:
What an artist may - or may not - have done, has for me no bearing on the artistic merit (or otherwise) of his/her work.
I disagree - there is no way I could purchase 'art' if I knew the artist had committed sex offences against a child - I think the thought of them creating their art and how their mind worked would make me feel sick!

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10936
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by david63 »

The Tinker wrote:
Not so ancient mariner wrote:
What an artist may - or may not - have done, has for me no bearing on the artistic merit (or otherwise) of his/her work.
I disagree - there is no way I could purchase 'art' if I knew the artist had committed sex offences against a child - I think the thought of them creating their art and how their mind worked would make me feel sick!
Is it not the case that most (all?) of the "Old Masters" had a somewhat murky past with "skeletons in the cupboard"?

User avatar

The Tinker
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1126
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by The Tinker »

david63 wrote:
The Tinker wrote:
Not so ancient mariner wrote:
What an artist may - or may not - have done, has for me no bearing on the artistic merit (or otherwise) of his/her work.
I disagree - there is no way I could purchase 'art' if I knew the artist had committed sex offences against a child - I think the thought of them creating their art and how their mind worked would make me feel sick!
Is it not the case that most (all?) of the "Old Masters" had a somewhat murky past with "skeletons in the cupboard"?
Not being an art buff - can you give me some examples, please?


Wobgoescruising
Cadet
Cadet
Posts: 76
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Wobgoescruising »

I'm guessing we buy paintings we like, not because of who painted them. There are many Rolf Harris paintings I like, we have a few prints which will be staying put whatever the outcome of this case. None of us know what goes on behind closed doors and I bet we've all got books, cd's, films etc by 'famous' people who have things going on that would change our opinion about them if we ever found out. I think In the case of Rolf Harris his career is over whatever the outcome which will probably see the end of Whitewall Galleries anyway as he is a huge part of the business.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Van Gogh was a violent self abusing hooligan ... that's it, his pictures are coming down for a start.

:thumbdown:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Romig1
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1954
Joined: January 2013
Location: 'Uddersfield - God's Own County

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Romig1 »

Do I have to chuck out my "Jim'll Fix It" medal??? :o

User avatar

The Tinker
First Officer
First Officer
Posts: 1126
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by The Tinker »

Romig1 wrote:
Do I have to chuck out my "Jim'll Fix It" medal??? :o
I would - just think where it might have been :sick:

User avatar

Holiday Planner
Second Officer
Second Officer
Posts: 400
Joined: January 2013
Location: Shropshire

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Holiday Planner »

There were Rolf Harris paintings for sale in the Gallery on our first 2 cruises. Before we went on Ventura 3 weeks ago, I said to Andrew that I bet there wouldn't be any this time ... I was right!
Angela

User avatar

Dark Knight
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5119
Joined: January 2013
Location: East Hull

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Dark Knight »

time for some art purchaes me thinks
we had our eye on a couple of originals to go with the ones we already have

I think there will be a bargain to be had....e bay anyone
Nihil Obstat

User avatar

Capt Black
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 516
Joined: January 2013
Location: Sarfend

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Capt Black »

The Tinker wrote:
david63 wrote:
The Tinker wrote:
Not so ancient mariner wrote:
What an artist may - or may not - have done, has for me no bearing on the artistic merit (or otherwise) of his/her work.
I disagree - there is no way I could purchase 'art' if I knew the artist had committed sex offences against a child - I think the thought of them creating their art and how their mind worked would make me feel sick!
Is it not the case that most (all?) of the "Old Masters" had a somewhat murky past with "skeletons in the cupboard"?
Not being an art buff - can you give me some examples, please?
Not quite the example that David meant, and maybe not therefore the sort of answer you're looking for, but Pete Townshend (The Who) is/was on the sex offender's register after accepting a caution for downloading child pornography several years ago. Didn't throw me old Who albums out , and he's still touring with Roger Daltrey.

User avatar

Topic author
Mo2013
I am banned
I am banned
Posts: 858
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Mo2013 »

Pete Townshend claimed he was doing research and he was only given a police caution.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... andal.html

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14170
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Onelife »

Mo2013 wrote:
emjay45 wrote:
Didn't Buckingham Palace give his portrait of the Queen back to the BBC who then mislaid it? I thought that was awful. No he hasn't been found guilty yet.
Emjay, Yes I understand the portrait of the Queen had been removed, but I didn't know the Beeb had subsequently mislaid it. What are they going to do if he is found not guilty?


Hi Mo

I would imagine they’ll increases in value as if found guilty he won’t be painting anymore for a while.
I don’t feel any sympathy for child abusers and if he is found guilty he should go down like the rest who succumbed to temptation with or without the victims consent.

Regards

Keith

User avatar

Silver_Shiney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 6400
Joined: January 2013
Location: Bradley Stoke

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Silver_Shiney »

Capt Black wrote:

Not quite the example that David meant, and maybe not therefore the sort of answer you're looking for, but Pete Townshend (The Who) is/was on the sex offender's register after accepting a caution for downloading child pornography several years ago. Didn't throw me old Who albums out , and he's still touring with Roger Daltrey.
As an aside, I saw a documentary on John Entwistle a while back. Every man and his dog appeared in front of the camera to praise the Who's bass man - except Daltrey...
Alan

Q-CC-KOS
Q-CC-TBM

User avatar

Topic author
Mo2013
I am banned
I am banned
Posts: 858
Joined: January 2013

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by Mo2013 »

It's fascinating to see how people react to these stories/allegations and the judgements they make. I am a fan of Michael Jackson and have seen him every time he played in England. I befriended a woman on holiday who was also a fan. When the first allegations about him and Jordy Chandler broke, she asked me what I thought. She was convinced of his innocence whereas I didn't know the man, I only knew Michael Jackson, the performer. I said I could not possibly know for sure whether or not he was guilty of child abuse. She never spoke to me again. There will be those who will be convinced of someone's guilt, and those who will give others the benefit of the doubt.

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10936
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Cunard remove Rolf Harris paintings

Unread post by david63 »

Mo2013 wrote:
... and those who will give others the benefit of the doubt.
a.k.a. innocent until proven guilty

Return to “General Chat”