Current Affairs

Chat about anything here
User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12533
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

It is easy to blame the airlines, the countries they are flying to or the government but if holidaymakers are behaving in these European destinations as they have done in Bournemouth, Leeds, Liverpool etc etc is it any surprise that they are bringing it home with them. We can blame Uncle Tom Cobley and all till the cows come home but individuals must take responsibility for their own protection and welfare. From what I have seen over the past few months some people have done neither but they will bleat loudly if they come a cropper.
From the little I have seen on the TV hotels abroad have gone to extraordinary lengths to ensure the safety of guests but holidaymakers have to play their part as well. It would be interesting to know the circumstances behind this infection although I realise this is something we may never know as it is doubtful anyone will admit it.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9669
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

Onelife wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 20:43
I can understand that the government needs to get the economy going again but l fail to see what bennifit there is to this country in flying holiday makers to holiday destinations with increasing infection rates....l can't see that this move will aleviate pressure off the airlines because l don't think the numbers will be there to make it viable.

Can someone enlighten me as l can't see the logic behind this.
I think you need to ask Boris for the answer Keith, I am sure he will be able to set your mind at ease. ;)
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14170
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

oldbluefox wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 21:44
It is easy to blame the airlines, the countries they are flying to or the government but if holidaymakers are behaving in these European destinations as they have done in Bournemouth, Leeds, Liverpool etc etc is it any surprise that they are bringing it home with them. We can blame Uncle Tom Cobley and all till the cows come home but individuals must take responsibility for their own protection and welfare. From what I have seen over the past few months some people have done neither but they will bleat loudly if they come a cropper.
From the little I have seen on the TV hotels abroad have gone to extraordinary lengths to ensure the safety of guests but holidaymakers have to play their part as well. It would be interesting to know the circumstances behind this infection although I realise this is something we may never know as it is doubtful anyone will admit it.
I’m not blaming the airlines for trying to kick start their industry but I think the same applies to airlines as it does with the cruise lines, a start/stop situation could be far more financially damaging than kick starting an industry prematurely…. one plane load of infected passengers would ground the industry indefinitely due to passenger confidence.

I believe there is a conflict of interests regarding countries that rely heavily on tourism, therefore, one shouldn’t be taken in by any of their infection statistics. I don’t blame them; I just don’t trust them to tell the truth.

With responsibility comes good judgement and opening up of air bridges other than for freight/ business travel seems irresponsible at this moment in time. ‘Our Uncle Tom Cubley and all’ need to stop making it up as they go along, rash decisions generally end up with paying higher prices, so instead of whisking holidaymakers off to foreign hotels, perhaps it would be more prudent to start encouraging people to spend their money in this country?

As an aside we have some tough negotiating to be done in the next few months so there couldn’t be a better time to demonstrate that theses countries need us more than what we need then.

I'm starting to think some of the decision making is held up with an elastic band...then again I could be talking a load of pants ;) :) :wave:
Last edited by Onelife on 24 Jul 2020, 07:44, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Onelife wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 20:43
I can understand that the government needs to get the economy going again but l fail to see what bennifit there is to this country in flying holiday makers to holiday destinations with increasing infection rates....l can't see that this move will aleviate pressure off the airlines because l don't think the numbers will be there to make it viable.

Can someone enlighten me as l can't see the logic behind this.
They are giving Mr & Mrs Dopey the freedom to make a choice but as they are Dopey by nature as well as by name they will buy a ticket and ignore all the precautions put in place to protect all concerned. The logic is to start the slow process of getting more and more people to return to some sort of normality, the first lot are guinea pigs ... would be my guess.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14170
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Manoverboard wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 07:43
Onelife wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 20:43
I can understand that the government needs to get the economy going again but l fail to see what bennifit there is to this country in flying holiday makers to holiday destinations with increasing infection rates....l can't see that this move will aleviate pressure off the airlines because l don't think the numbers will be there to make it viable.

Can someone enlighten me as l can't see the logic behind this.
They are giving Mr & Mrs Dopey the freedom to make a choice but as they are Dopey by nature as well as by name they will buy a ticket and ignore all the precautions put in place to protect all concerned. The logic is to start the slow process of getting more and more people to return to some sort of normality, the first lot are guinea pigs ... would be my guess.
Good morning Mob…. that’s all well and good but do you know how much it costs to keep a pig in quarantine for two weeks? :lol:

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14170
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

towny44 wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 22:42
Onelife wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 20:43
I can understand that the government needs to get the economy going again but l fail to see what bennifit there is to this country in flying holiday makers to holiday destinations with increasing infection rates....l can't see that this move will aleviate pressure off the airlines because l don't think the numbers will be there to make it viable.

Can someone enlighten me as l can't see the logic behind this.
I think you need to ask Boris for the answer Keith, I am sure he will be able to set your mind at ease. ;)
I doubt it John.....

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9669
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

There's an interesting article in today's Mail about a Toronto University report suggesting that the timing of Lockdown has had little impact on the death rate, it does however help to prevent the health service becoming overstretched. The report believes that obesity levels and underlying health issues are the main issue for death rates, and it also highlights that poorer countries fare much better with far lower death rates. It suggests this could be due to lower obesity levels, and possibly stronger immune systems from higher Vitamin D levels, as most of the poorer countries are in the tropics, and maybe due to their insanitary living conditions.
If I were Keefie I might be saying I told you so.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

barney wrote: 22 Jul 2020, 09:14
I think if the truth be known, the ISC was hoping to find a smoking gun but in reality, found nothing so have tried to move the goalposts.
Remember the Mueller report in America?
They couldn’t find evidence of Russian collusion so moved on to obstructing the investigation.

Imagine this hypothetical.
The Government instructs the Intelligence Service to dedicate many hours looking for some kind of Russian interference, and while doing this, there is a major terror attack.
The press would have a field day.
Can you imagine if the Director had to say that he’d moved staff away from critical work.
A link to a story today to reinforce my point about the ISC
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... d-with-isc

They are basically a bunch of well meaning but out of their depth MPs who I wouldn't trust with any sensitive information.

The well meaning but out of their depth 'experts' who post opinions on forums should also take note that everything goes on behind the scenes.
The moment it comes into the public domain, the system falls and we are all in grave danger.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Topic author
Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17762
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Stephen »

Think about the possible alternative if you are against wearing a mask as from today in shops.

115798856_10218019223138618_5209810383717830225_n.jpg
Last edited by Stephen on 24 Jul 2020, 09:56, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12533
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Are our security services or the government really going to disclose what is going on behind the scenes? Are we really so naive to believe that it's prudent in the cause of transparency and openness to disclose everything we are doing which would place security personnel at risk? And if the level of Russian interference amounts to their activity on social media trying to influence the more gullible it just demonstrates how desperate some have become to discredit our democracy.
I must admit, after the past four years we have witnessed plenty of examples of groups financed from outside our shores trying to overcome a democratic vote.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9669
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by towny44 »

oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:04
I must admit, after the past four years we have witnessed plenty of examples of groups financed from outside our shores trying to overcome a democratic vote.
Most of those were members of the ruling liberal elite who took great umbrage in the British public disagreeing with their love of the EU, and more likely the loss of the great Brussels gravy train. How dare we?
Last edited by towny44 on 24 Jul 2020, 10:28, edited 1 time in total.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10936
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by david63 »

oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:04
And if the level of Russian interference amounts to their activity on social media trying to influence the more gullible
Or perhaps another way of looking at it is that that is all they are able to do because the security services are doing their job and blocking everything else.

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12533
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

towny44 wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:28
Most of those were members of the ruling liberal elite who took great umbrage in the British public disagreeing with their love of the EU, and more likely the loss of the great Brussels gravy train. How dare we?
Oh I couldn't possibly say that!!!! :angel:
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12533
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

david63 wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:30
oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:04
And if the level of Russian interference amounts to their activity on social media trying to influence the more gullible
Or perhaps another way of looking at it is that that is all they are able to do because the security services are doing their job and blocking everything else.
Of course that's what is happening. And would the security services advertise it if the Russians did manage to penetrate our defences? Common sense tells you the answer to that one.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

towny44 wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:28
oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:04
I must admit, after the past four years we have witnessed plenty of examples of groups financed from outside our shores trying to overcome a democratic vote.
Most of those were members of the ruling liberal elite who took great umbrage in the British public disagreeing with their love of the EU, and more likely the loss of the great Brussels gravy train. How dare we?
Very little has been reported about the historic agreement between the 27 with reference to the mutualisation of debt John.

Had we still been a member, it is estimated that out 'share' would have been in the region of about £110 billion euros.
Much of this going in the way of grants, not loans, so basically agreeing to write it off.
Sure, some of it would have been coming back to the UK but not much.
This would have been on top of our normal contributions.

Many in Europe see it as a 'Hamilton' moment, similar to when the United States formed.
United States of Europe ?
Anyone remember our old mate Jack Staff chastising me for even suggesting such a thing and said that it would never happen.

Slowly but surely, they are etching away at individual sovereignty.
Harmonisation of taxes next.
Just your wait ( as they sang in Hamilton)

There is a strong movement to oust the unanimity rule in favour of Qualified Majority Voting on all issues.
Then Brussels has total control, which was always the point.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12533
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by oldbluefox »

I think our friend Jack was a worse predictor of form than Keefy? :lol:
Last edited by oldbluefox on 24 Jul 2020, 10:55, edited 1 time in total.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

barney wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 09:25
barney wrote: 22 Jul 2020, 09:14
I think if the truth be known, the ISC was hoping to find a smoking gun but in reality, found nothing so have tried to move the goalposts.
Remember the Mueller report in America?
They couldn’t find evidence of Russian collusion so moved on to obstructing the investigation.

Imagine this hypothetical.
The Government instructs the Intelligence Service to dedicate many hours looking for some kind of Russian interference, and while doing this, there is a major terror attack.
The press would have a field day.
Can you imagine if the Director had to say that he’d moved staff away from critical work.
A link to a story today to reinforce my point about the ISC
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... d-with-isc

They are basically a bunch of well meaning but out of their depth MPs who I wouldn't trust with any sensitive information.

The well meaning but out of their depth 'experts' who post opinions on forums should also take note that everything goes on behind the scenes.
The moment it comes into the public domain, the system falls and we are all in grave danger.
I note that you use the Guardian to illustrate your point, a newspaper normally dismissed by readers of this forum. Yet, this time, no one seems to have a problem with the Guardian at all! :lol:

Also, I’m amused that you have chosen to have a little dig at people who post on forums - whilst posting on a forum yourself! 😂
Gill

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:54
I think our friend Jack was a worse predictor of form than Keefy? :lol:
We don’t know yet. We’re still in a transition period
Last edited by Gill W on 24 Jul 2020, 10:57, edited 1 time in total.
Gill

User avatar

Gill W
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 4897
Joined: January 2013
Location: Kent

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Gill W »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 12:49
In other news that Bojo critics won't be shouting about, the Covid Symptom Study, the people behind the Zoe App, which currently has over 4,000,000 people, including us, submitting data daily, has done an analysis on the impact of temperature on the virus.

They have found that there is a 15% drop in mortality for every 1 degree C rise in temperature.

So, taking April, for example, London average temperature 13C. Paris 17C. Madrid 19C. Rome 19C.

Any clues there as to why we had more deaths than France, Spain or Italy?

I'm now standing by for that research to be dismissed as less relevant than Dominic Cummings being a p***ock.
I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.

However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)

If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
Gill

User avatar

Manoverboard
Ex Team Member
Posts: 13014
Joined: January 2013
Location: Dorset

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Manoverboard »

Gill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:55
oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:54
I think our friend Jack was a worse predictor of form than Keefy? :lol:
We don’t know yet. We’re still in a transition period
We are ' OUT ' is what we are :clap: :clap: :clap:
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by barney »

Gill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:08
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 12:49
In other news that Bojo critics won't be shouting about, the Covid Symptom Study, the people behind the Zoe App, which currently has over 4,000,000 people, including us, submitting data daily, has done an analysis on the impact of temperature on the virus.

They have found that there is a 15% drop in mortality for every 1 degree C rise in temperature.

So, taking April, for example, London average temperature 13C. Paris 17C. Madrid 19C. Rome 19C.

Any clues there as to why we had more deaths than France, Spain or Italy?

I'm now standing by for that research to be dismissed as less relevant than Dominic Cummings being a p***ock.
I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.

However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)

If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
I think it’s as simple as how each country is recording it Gill.
There is even a difference in the four U.K. countries.
I cannot believe that India has had a million more infections than us but 15 thousand fewer deaths when our stats show that Asians have a higher mortality rate here.
Many others had had huge infections but low mortality.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17025
Joined: February 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Gill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:08
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 12:49
In other news that Bojo critics won't be shouting about, the Covid Symptom Study, the people behind the Zoe App, which currently has over 4,000,000 people, including us, submitting data daily, has done an analysis on the impact of temperature on the virus.

They have found that there is a 15% drop in mortality for every 1 degree C rise in temperature.

So, taking April, for example, London average temperature 13C. Paris 17C. Madrid 19C. Rome 19C.

Any clues there as to why we had more deaths than France, Spain or Italy?

I'm now standing by for that research to be dismissed as less relevant than Dominic Cummings being a p***ock.
I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.

However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)

If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
Not being picky Gill but really I prefer the research conducted by the scientists behind the Covid App to your amateur analysis. And they seem pretty clear on it.
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 24 Jul 2020, 11:38, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14170
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:33
Gill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:08
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 12:49
In other news that Bojo critics won't be shouting about, the Covid Symptom Study, the people behind the Zoe App, which currently has over 4,000,000 people, including us, submitting data daily, has done an analysis on the impact of temperature on the virus.

They have found that there is a 15% drop in mortality for every 1 degree C rise in temperature.

So, taking April, for example, London average temperature 13C. Paris 17C. Madrid 19C. Rome 19C.

Any clues there as to why we had more deaths than France, Spain or Italy?

I'm now standing by for that research to be dismissed as less relevant than Dominic Cummings being a p***ock.
I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.

However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)

If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
Not being picky Gill but really I prefer the research conducted by the scientists behind the Covid App to your amateur analysis. And they seem pretty clear on it.
I quite enjoy Gills take on things as her posts generally give opposing views which on balance are good for a forums such as ours…
…a very astute lady is our Gill

I also love Theresa :D :thumbup:

User avatar

Topic author
Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17762
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Stephen »

Onelife wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 12:23
Mervyn and Trish wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:33
Gill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:08


I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.

However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)

If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
Not being picky Gill but really I prefer the research conducted by the scientists behind the Covid App to your amateur analysis. And they seem pretty clear on it.
I quite enjoy Gills take on things as her posts generally give opposing views which on balance are good for a forums such as ours…
…a very astute lady is our Gill

I also love Theresa :D :thumbup:

Crawler :)

User avatar

Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14170
Joined: January 2013

Re: Current Affairs

Unread post by Onelife »

oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:54
I think our friend Jack was a worse predictor of form than Keefy? :lol:
You better believe it Foxy…to date I’m averaging a one in three success rates with my predictions which is far better than most of the other, so called experts on this forum :thumbup: ;)

Return to “General Chat”