Current Affairs
-
oldbluefox
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12533
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
Re: Current Affairs
It is easy to blame the airlines, the countries they are flying to or the government but if holidaymakers are behaving in these European destinations as they have done in Bournemouth, Leeds, Liverpool etc etc is it any surprise that they are bringing it home with them. We can blame Uncle Tom Cobley and all till the cows come home but individuals must take responsibility for their own protection and welfare. From what I have seen over the past few months some people have done neither but they will bleat loudly if they come a cropper.
From the little I have seen on the TV hotels abroad have gone to extraordinary lengths to ensure the safety of guests but holidaymakers have to play their part as well. It would be interesting to know the circumstances behind this infection although I realise this is something we may never know as it is doubtful anyone will admit it.
From the little I have seen on the TV hotels abroad have gone to extraordinary lengths to ensure the safety of guests but holidaymakers have to play their part as well. It would be interesting to know the circumstances behind this infection although I realise this is something we may never know as it is doubtful anyone will admit it.
I was taught to be cautious
-
towny44
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 9669
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Huddersfield
Re: Current Affairs
I think you need to ask Boris for the answer Keith, I am sure he will be able to set your mind at ease.Onelife wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 20:43I can understand that the government needs to get the economy going again but l fail to see what bennifit there is to this country in flying holiday makers to holiday destinations with increasing infection rates....l can't see that this move will aleviate pressure off the airlines because l don't think the numbers will be there to make it viable.
Can someone enlighten me as l can't see the logic behind this.
John
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
-
Onelife
- Captain

- Posts: 14169
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
I’m not blaming the airlines for trying to kick start their industry but I think the same applies to airlines as it does with the cruise lines, a start/stop situation could be far more financially damaging than kick starting an industry prematurely…. one plane load of infected passengers would ground the industry indefinitely due to passenger confidence.oldbluefox wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 21:44It is easy to blame the airlines, the countries they are flying to or the government but if holidaymakers are behaving in these European destinations as they have done in Bournemouth, Leeds, Liverpool etc etc is it any surprise that they are bringing it home with them. We can blame Uncle Tom Cobley and all till the cows come home but individuals must take responsibility for their own protection and welfare. From what I have seen over the past few months some people have done neither but they will bleat loudly if they come a cropper.
From the little I have seen on the TV hotels abroad have gone to extraordinary lengths to ensure the safety of guests but holidaymakers have to play their part as well. It would be interesting to know the circumstances behind this infection although I realise this is something we may never know as it is doubtful anyone will admit it.
I believe there is a conflict of interests regarding countries that rely heavily on tourism, therefore, one shouldn’t be taken in by any of their infection statistics. I don’t blame them; I just don’t trust them to tell the truth.
With responsibility comes good judgement and opening up of air bridges other than for freight/ business travel seems irresponsible at this moment in time. ‘Our Uncle Tom Cubley and all’ need to stop making it up as they go along, rash decisions generally end up with paying higher prices, so instead of whisking holidaymakers off to foreign hotels, perhaps it would be more prudent to start encouraging people to spend their money in this country?
As an aside we have some tough negotiating to be done in the next few months so there couldn’t be a better time to demonstrate that theses countries need us more than what we need then.
I'm starting to think some of the decision making is held up with an elastic band...then again I could be talking a load of pants
Last edited by Onelife on 24 Jul 2020, 07:44, edited 1 time in total.
-
Manoverboard
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 13014
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Dorset
Re: Current Affairs
They are giving Mr & Mrs Dopey the freedom to make a choice but as they are Dopey by nature as well as by name they will buy a ticket and ignore all the precautions put in place to protect all concerned. The logic is to start the slow process of getting more and more people to return to some sort of normality, the first lot are guinea pigs ... would be my guess.Onelife wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 20:43I can understand that the government needs to get the economy going again but l fail to see what bennifit there is to this country in flying holiday makers to holiday destinations with increasing infection rates....l can't see that this move will aleviate pressure off the airlines because l don't think the numbers will be there to make it viable.
Can someone enlighten me as l can't see the logic behind this.
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being
-
Onelife
- Captain

- Posts: 14169
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
Good morning Mob…. that’s all well and good but do you know how much it costs to keep a pig in quarantine for two weeks?Manoverboard wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 07:43They are giving Mr & Mrs Dopey the freedom to make a choice but as they are Dopey by nature as well as by name they will buy a ticket and ignore all the precautions put in place to protect all concerned. The logic is to start the slow process of getting more and more people to return to some sort of normality, the first lot are guinea pigs ... would be my guess.Onelife wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 20:43I can understand that the government needs to get the economy going again but l fail to see what bennifit there is to this country in flying holiday makers to holiday destinations with increasing infection rates....l can't see that this move will aleviate pressure off the airlines because l don't think the numbers will be there to make it viable.
Can someone enlighten me as l can't see the logic behind this.
-
Onelife
- Captain

- Posts: 14169
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
I doubt it John.....towny44 wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 22:42I think you need to ask Boris for the answer Keith, I am sure he will be able to set your mind at ease.Onelife wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 20:43I can understand that the government needs to get the economy going again but l fail to see what bennifit there is to this country in flying holiday makers to holiday destinations with increasing infection rates....l can't see that this move will aleviate pressure off the airlines because l don't think the numbers will be there to make it viable.
Can someone enlighten me as l can't see the logic behind this.![]()
-
towny44
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 9669
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Huddersfield
Re: Current Affairs
There's an interesting article in today's Mail about a Toronto University report suggesting that the timing of Lockdown has had little impact on the death rate, it does however help to prevent the health service becoming overstretched. The report believes that obesity levels and underlying health issues are the main issue for death rates, and it also highlights that poorer countries fare much better with far lower death rates. It suggests this could be due to lower obesity levels, and possibly stronger immune systems from higher Vitamin D levels, as most of the poorer countries are in the tropics, and maybe due to their insanitary living conditions.
If I were Keefie I might be saying I told you so.
If I were Keefie I might be saying I told you so.
John
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
-
barney
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 5852
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Instow Devon
Re: Current Affairs
A link to a story today to reinforce my point about the ISCbarney wrote: 22 Jul 2020, 09:14I think if the truth be known, the ISC was hoping to find a smoking gun but in reality, found nothing so have tried to move the goalposts.
Remember the Mueller report in America?
They couldn’t find evidence of Russian collusion so moved on to obstructing the investigation.
Imagine this hypothetical.
The Government instructs the Intelligence Service to dedicate many hours looking for some kind of Russian interference, and while doing this, there is a major terror attack.
The press would have a field day.
Can you imagine if the Director had to say that he’d moved staff away from critical work.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... d-with-isc
They are basically a bunch of well meaning but out of their depth MPs who I wouldn't trust with any sensitive information.
The well meaning but out of their depth 'experts' who post opinions on forums should also take note that everything goes on behind the scenes.
The moment it comes into the public domain, the system falls and we are all in grave danger.
Free and Accepted
-
Stephen
Topic author - Commodore

- Posts: 17762
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)
Re: Current Affairs
Think about the possible alternative if you are against wearing a mask as from today in shops.
Last edited by Stephen on 24 Jul 2020, 09:56, edited 1 time in total.
-
oldbluefox
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12533
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
Re: Current Affairs
Are our security services or the government really going to disclose what is going on behind the scenes? Are we really so naive to believe that it's prudent in the cause of transparency and openness to disclose everything we are doing which would place security personnel at risk? And if the level of Russian interference amounts to their activity on social media trying to influence the more gullible it just demonstrates how desperate some have become to discredit our democracy.
I must admit, after the past four years we have witnessed plenty of examples of groups financed from outside our shores trying to overcome a democratic vote.
I must admit, after the past four years we have witnessed plenty of examples of groups financed from outside our shores trying to overcome a democratic vote.
I was taught to be cautious
-
towny44
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 9669
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Huddersfield
Re: Current Affairs
Most of those were members of the ruling liberal elite who took great umbrage in the British public disagreeing with their love of the EU, and more likely the loss of the great Brussels gravy train. How dare we?oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:04I must admit, after the past four years we have witnessed plenty of examples of groups financed from outside our shores trying to overcome a democratic vote.
Last edited by towny44 on 24 Jul 2020, 10:28, edited 1 time in total.
John
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
-
david63
- Site Admin

- Posts: 10936
- Joined: January 2012
- Location: Lancashire
Re: Current Affairs
Or perhaps another way of looking at it is that that is all they are able to do because the security services are doing their job and blocking everything else.oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:04And if the level of Russian interference amounts to their activity on social media trying to influence the more gullible
-
oldbluefox
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12533
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
Re: Current Affairs
Oh I couldn't possibly say that!!!!towny44 wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:28Most of those were members of the ruling liberal elite who took great umbrage in the British public disagreeing with their love of the EU, and more likely the loss of the great Brussels gravy train. How dare we?
I was taught to be cautious
-
oldbluefox
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12533
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
Re: Current Affairs
Of course that's what is happening. And would the security services advertise it if the Russians did manage to penetrate our defences? Common sense tells you the answer to that one.david63 wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:30Or perhaps another way of looking at it is that that is all they are able to do because the security services are doing their job and blocking everything else.oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:04And if the level of Russian interference amounts to their activity on social media trying to influence the more gullible
I was taught to be cautious
-
barney
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 5852
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Instow Devon
Re: Current Affairs
Very little has been reported about the historic agreement between the 27 with reference to the mutualisation of debt John.towny44 wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:28Most of those were members of the ruling liberal elite who took great umbrage in the British public disagreeing with their love of the EU, and more likely the loss of the great Brussels gravy train. How dare we?oldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:04I must admit, after the past four years we have witnessed plenty of examples of groups financed from outside our shores trying to overcome a democratic vote.
Had we still been a member, it is estimated that out 'share' would have been in the region of about £110 billion euros.
Much of this going in the way of grants, not loans, so basically agreeing to write it off.
Sure, some of it would have been coming back to the UK but not much.
This would have been on top of our normal contributions.
Many in Europe see it as a 'Hamilton' moment, similar to when the United States formed.
United States of Europe ?
Anyone remember our old mate Jack Staff chastising me for even suggesting such a thing and said that it would never happen.
Slowly but surely, they are etching away at individual sovereignty.
Harmonisation of taxes next.
Just your wait ( as they sang in Hamilton)
There is a strong movement to oust the unanimity rule in favour of Qualified Majority Voting on all issues.
Then Brussels has total control, which was always the point.
Free and Accepted
-
oldbluefox
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12533
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
Re: Current Affairs
I think our friend Jack was a worse predictor of form than Keefy? 
Last edited by oldbluefox on 24 Jul 2020, 10:55, edited 1 time in total.
I was taught to be cautious
-
Gill W
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 4897
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Kent
Re: Current Affairs
I note that you use the Guardian to illustrate your point, a newspaper normally dismissed by readers of this forum. Yet, this time, no one seems to have a problem with the Guardian at all!barney wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 09:25A link to a story today to reinforce my point about the ISCbarney wrote: 22 Jul 2020, 09:14I think if the truth be known, the ISC was hoping to find a smoking gun but in reality, found nothing so have tried to move the goalposts.
Remember the Mueller report in America?
They couldn’t find evidence of Russian collusion so moved on to obstructing the investigation.
Imagine this hypothetical.
The Government instructs the Intelligence Service to dedicate many hours looking for some kind of Russian interference, and while doing this, there is a major terror attack.
The press would have a field day.
Can you imagine if the Director had to say that he’d moved staff away from critical work.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... d-with-isc
They are basically a bunch of well meaning but out of their depth MPs who I wouldn't trust with any sensitive information.
The well meaning but out of their depth 'experts' who post opinions on forums should also take note that everything goes on behind the scenes.
The moment it comes into the public domain, the system falls and we are all in grave danger.
Also, I’m amused that you have chosen to have a little dig at people who post on forums - whilst posting on a forum yourself!
Gill
-
Gill W
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 4897
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Kent
Re: Current Affairs
We don’t know yet. We’re still in a transition periodoldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:54I think our friend Jack was a worse predictor of form than Keefy?![]()
Last edited by Gill W on 24 Jul 2020, 10:57, edited 1 time in total.
Gill
-
Gill W
- Senior First Officer

- Posts: 4897
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Kent
Re: Current Affairs
I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 12:49In other news that Bojo critics won't be shouting about, the Covid Symptom Study, the people behind the Zoe App, which currently has over 4,000,000 people, including us, submitting data daily, has done an analysis on the impact of temperature on the virus.
They have found that there is a 15% drop in mortality for every 1 degree C rise in temperature.
So, taking April, for example, London average temperature 13C. Paris 17C. Madrid 19C. Rome 19C.
Any clues there as to why we had more deaths than France, Spain or Italy?
I'm now standing by for that research to be dismissed as less relevant than Dominic Cummings being a p***ock.
However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)
If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
Gill
-
Manoverboard
- Ex Team Member
- Posts: 13014
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Dorset
Re: Current Affairs
We are ' OUT ' is what we areGill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:55We don’t know yet. We’re still in a transition periodoldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:54I think our friend Jack was a worse predictor of form than Keefy?![]()
Keep smiling, it's good for your well being
-
barney
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 5852
- Joined: March 2013
- Location: Instow Devon
Re: Current Affairs
I think it’s as simple as how each country is recording it Gill.Gill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:08I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 12:49In other news that Bojo critics won't be shouting about, the Covid Symptom Study, the people behind the Zoe App, which currently has over 4,000,000 people, including us, submitting data daily, has done an analysis on the impact of temperature on the virus.
They have found that there is a 15% drop in mortality for every 1 degree C rise in temperature.
So, taking April, for example, London average temperature 13C. Paris 17C. Madrid 19C. Rome 19C.
Any clues there as to why we had more deaths than France, Spain or Italy?
I'm now standing by for that research to be dismissed as less relevant than Dominic Cummings being a p***ock.
However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)
If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
There is even a difference in the four U.K. countries.
I cannot believe that India has had a million more infections than us but 15 thousand fewer deaths when our stats show that Asians have a higher mortality rate here.
Many others had had huge infections but low mortality.
Free and Accepted
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17025
- Joined: February 2013
Re: Current Affairs
Not being picky Gill but really I prefer the research conducted by the scientists behind the Covid App to your amateur analysis. And they seem pretty clear on it.Gill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:08I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 12:49In other news that Bojo critics won't be shouting about, the Covid Symptom Study, the people behind the Zoe App, which currently has over 4,000,000 people, including us, submitting data daily, has done an analysis on the impact of temperature on the virus.
They have found that there is a 15% drop in mortality for every 1 degree C rise in temperature.
So, taking April, for example, London average temperature 13C. Paris 17C. Madrid 19C. Rome 19C.
Any clues there as to why we had more deaths than France, Spain or Italy?
I'm now standing by for that research to be dismissed as less relevant than Dominic Cummings being a p***ock.
However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)
If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
Last edited by Mervyn and Trish on 24 Jul 2020, 11:38, edited 1 time in total.
-
Onelife
- Captain

- Posts: 14169
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
I quite enjoy Gills take on things as her posts generally give opposing views which on balance are good for a forums such as ours…Mervyn and Trish wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:33Not being picky Gill but really I prefer the research conducted by the scientists behind the Covid App to your amateur analysis. And they seem pretty clear on it.Gill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:08I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.Mervyn and Trish wrote: 23 Jul 2020, 12:49In other news that Bojo critics won't be shouting about, the Covid Symptom Study, the people behind the Zoe App, which currently has over 4,000,000 people, including us, submitting data daily, has done an analysis on the impact of temperature on the virus.
They have found that there is a 15% drop in mortality for every 1 degree C rise in temperature.
So, taking April, for example, London average temperature 13C. Paris 17C. Madrid 19C. Rome 19C.
Any clues there as to why we had more deaths than France, Spain or Italy?
I'm now standing by for that research to be dismissed as less relevant than Dominic Cummings being a p***ock.
However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)
If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
…a very astute lady is our Gill
I also love Theresa
-
Stephen
Topic author - Commodore

- Posts: 17762
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)
Re: Current Affairs
Onelife wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 12:23I quite enjoy Gills take on things as her posts generally give opposing views which on balance are good for a forums such as ours…Mervyn and Trish wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:33Not being picky Gill but really I prefer the research conducted by the scientists behind the Covid App to your amateur analysis. And they seem pretty clear on it.Gill W wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 11:08
I think that cold weather can generally increase the amounts of people dying, as when we have a cold snap in winter, more people die.
However, think April was warmer than average in the U.K. (I have looked this up to confirm my memory)
If it was a factor, then it would have to follow that colder countries, have a higher death rate per capita than the U.K. I haven’t checked this, but I don’t think this is the case.
…a very astute lady is our Gill
I also love Theresa![]()
![]()
Crawler
-
Onelife
- Captain

- Posts: 14169
- Joined: January 2013
Re: Current Affairs
You better believe it Foxy…to date I’m averaging a one in three success rates with my predictions which is far better than most of the other, so called experts on this forumoldbluefox wrote: 24 Jul 2020, 10:54I think our friend Jack was a worse predictor of form than Keefy?![]()