RIP Frank Field

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Topic author
oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12524
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

RIP Frank Field

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Sorry to hear of the death of Frank Field, one of the better Labour MPs and one I could happily vote for.
He was asked to look at social reform, to "think the unthinkable" which is exactly what he did and came up with some very realistic targets and imaginative ideas. Blair ignored the lot and thereafter we heard very little from Frank.
RIP to a genuinely good guy.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10929
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: RIP Frank Field

Unread post by david63 »

Certainly one of the better MPs of any party.

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: RIP Frank Field

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Yes I agree. A man of honour.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: RIP Frank Field

Unread post by towny44 »

But I assume from the amount of money his scheme would have cost, he must have believed in a magic money tree.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Topic author
oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12524
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: RIP Frank Field

Unread post by oldbluefox »

towny44 wrote: 25 Apr 2024, 11:39
But I assume from the amount of money his scheme would have cost, he must have believed in a magic money tree.
Really? That wasn't/isn't my understanding.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... ution-plan
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: RIP Frank Field

Unread post by towny44 »

oldbluefox wrote: 25 Apr 2024, 12:00
towny44 wrote: 25 Apr 2024, 11:39
But I assume from the amount of money his scheme would have cost, he must have believed in a magic money tree.
Really? That wasn't/isn't my understanding.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... ution-plan
I dont believe his scheme was ever fully costed, on paper is seemed sensible to ring fence contributions, but there was no mention of who would make up the current shortfall, never mind provide the massive extra funding that everyone recognises is needed to make the welfare system fit for purpose.
So unless contributions from workers and govt were to be massively increased I can see no way his scheme would be any better than the current one where the civil service manages the funding via the various govt depts that already exist.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

Return to “General Chat”