RIP Frank Field
-
oldbluefox
Topic author - Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12524
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
RIP Frank Field
Sorry to hear of the death of Frank Field, one of the better Labour MPs and one I could happily vote for.
He was asked to look at social reform, to "think the unthinkable" which is exactly what he did and came up with some very realistic targets and imaginative ideas. Blair ignored the lot and thereafter we heard very little from Frank.
RIP to a genuinely good guy.
He was asked to look at social reform, to "think the unthinkable" which is exactly what he did and came up with some very realistic targets and imaginative ideas. Blair ignored the lot and thereafter we heard very little from Frank.
RIP to a genuinely good guy.
I was taught to be cautious
-
david63
- Site Admin

- Posts: 10929
- Joined: January 2012
- Location: Lancashire
-
Mervyn and Trish
- Commodore

- Posts: 17014
- Joined: February 2013
Re: RIP Frank Field
Yes I agree. A man of honour.
-
towny44
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 9668
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Huddersfield
Re: RIP Frank Field
But I assume from the amount of money his scheme would have cost, he must have believed in a magic money tree.
John
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
-
oldbluefox
Topic author - Ex Team Member
- Posts: 12524
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Cumbria
Re: RIP Frank Field
Really? That wasn't/isn't my understanding.towny44 wrote: 25 Apr 2024, 11:39But I assume from the amount of money his scheme would have cost, he must have believed in a magic money tree.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... ution-plan
I was taught to be cautious
-
towny44
- Deputy Captain

- Posts: 9668
- Joined: January 2013
- Location: Huddersfield
Re: RIP Frank Field
I dont believe his scheme was ever fully costed, on paper is seemed sensible to ring fence contributions, but there was no mention of who would make up the current shortfall, never mind provide the massive extra funding that everyone recognises is needed to make the welfare system fit for purpose.oldbluefox wrote: 25 Apr 2024, 12:00Really? That wasn't/isn't my understanding.towny44 wrote: 25 Apr 2024, 11:39But I assume from the amount of money his scheme would have cost, he must have believed in a magic money tree.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/201 ... ution-plan
So unless contributions from workers and govt were to be massively increased I can see no way his scheme would be any better than the current one where the civil service manages the funding via the various govt depts that already exist.
John
Trainee Pensioner since 2000
Trainee Pensioner since 2000