Not Our King

Chat about anything here
User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Not Our King

Unread post by Onelife »

You’ve got to give it to Camilla, she knows how to treat the natives :shock: …. I don’t know about laughing it off, she should be bowing her head in shame. The Australian press are going to love her nonchalant dismissal of an elected indigenous senator. NOT!

https://news.sky.com/story/royal-visit- ... s-13238066

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12524
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by oldbluefox »

If I invite somebody into my home they are my guest and I treat them accordingly despite any differences we might have. Wrong time, wrong place, wrong occasion, she was rude in the extreme no matter how strongly she felt about her cause and an embarrassment to the dignity of ordinary Australian people.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

And wrong too. Constitutionally he is her King. If she wants a change to the constitution she can argue for it. In the meantime her duty as a Senator is to defend it. How can anyone make this Camilla's fault?


poole boy
Senior Second Officer
Senior Second Officer
Posts: 622
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by poole boy »

sorry onelife but the more posts I read from you on this subject the more nuts I think you are

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Onelife »

poole boy wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 10:09
sorry onelife but the more posts I read from you on this subject the more nuts I think you are
:lol:

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12524
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by oldbluefox »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 10:00
And wrong too. Constitutionally he is her King. If she wants a change to the constitution she can argue for it. In the meantime her duty as a Senator is to defend it. How can anyone make this Camilla's fault?
I don't know what Camilla is reputed to have done but whatever it is the woman's actions should have received the contempt they deserved. By all means have your constitutional views but these should be addressed to the right audience in an appropriate manner which that wasn't.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

david63
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10929
Joined: January 2012
Location: Lancashire

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by david63 »

Off with her head I say - the protestor not Camilla!

User avatar

Stephen
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17750
Joined: January 2013
Location: Down South - The civilised end of the country :)

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Stephen »

david63 wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 11:10
Off with her head I say - the protestor not Camilla!

Make it a large blade so Onelife can keep her company :)

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Onelife »

From Lidia Thorpe’s prospective and that of her ancestors she represents I can fully understand why she used this opportunity to highlight the injustices of which her people were subjected to at the hands of our colonial aspirations…mass killings, children taken away from of their parents, their traditional lands taken from them, their cultural identity denied.

…you would have thought by now that Charlie and Cam would have known their presences would insight such reactions…the truth is that the majority of Aboriginal people/Australians now want to become a republic and we should respect this and stop sending these pompous freeloaders on their all expenses paid holidays to where they are not wanted.


CaroleF
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 2182
Joined: January 2013
Location: Hampshire

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by CaroleF »

Onelife, I know very well that you'd like to do away with the monarchy. As you probably know I disagree with you for all sorts of reasons. It's your right to state your views and your objections to the monarchy. What I find so unpleasant is the fact that you can't use the people's correct names. It's rather like Foxy's view saying that the protestor was rude and stating her objections in the wrong place. I don't believe that calling the King and Queen, 'Charlie' and 'Cam' enhances your beliefs, it's rude and I find it unpleasant. Call them Charles and Camilla if you can't bear to use their titles but please for the sake of my blood pressure stop with these names. Certainly talk about your reasons for changing how the country is ruled, I have no objection to that, I disagree with you but it's your right to say what you think but please be polite, at least on this forum.

User avatar

Ray B
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3544
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Ray B »

Nice one Carole, onelife will be reeling from that and may return a better man. :(
Don't worry, be happy

User avatar

Ray B
Senior First Officer
Senior First Officer
Posts: 3544
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Ray B »

History is History and no amount of apologise or money is going to change anything.
Don't worry, be happy

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12524
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by oldbluefox »

You cannot undo history. You can only live with it and learn from it.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Onelife »

CaroleF wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 12:32
Onelife, I know very well that you'd like to do away with the monarchy. As you probably know I disagree with you for all sorts of reasons. It's your right to state your views and your objections to the monarchy. What I find so unpleasant is the fact that you can't use the people's correct names. It's rather like Foxy's view saying that the protestor was rude and stating her objections in the wrong place. I don't believe that calling the King and Queen, 'Charlie' and 'Cam' enhances your beliefs, it's rude and I find it unpleasant. Call them Charles and Camilla if you can't bear to use their titles but please for the sake of my blood pressure stop with these names. Certainly talk about your reasons for changing how the country is ruled, I have no objection to that, I disagree with you but it's your right to say what you think but please be polite, at least on this forum.
Hi Carole, I thank you for your (as Ray has said) well-crafted response to which I respond thus. As you and others will have noticed I have no respect for the Monarchy and despise everything that props up this archaic outdated institution. I have however toned down my descriptive use of words to describe what is probably this country’s most dysfunctional family and in doing so should be praised for my reformed use of how I refer to your King and Queen (it always makes me laugh when I think of Cam masquerading as a Queen) :lol: to that of a much more respectful Charlie and Cam…. I can and have used far worse to describe theses two adulterers.
Last edited by Onelife on 21 Oct 2024, 15:34, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by towny44 »

Onelife, you may well despise the Monarchy but no matter what Charles or Camilla say or do is going to make the Australian government hand over the running of their country to the less than 4% aboriginal population. But I gues that no matter how hard we try to stop you, you will continue to make a fool of yourself by jumping on every anti monarchist outburst, no matter how remote it is to the crown.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Onelife »

towny44 wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 16:13
Onelife, you may well despise the Monarchy but no matter what Charles or Camilla say or do is going to make the Australian government hand over the running of their country to the less than 4% aboriginal population. But I gues that no matter how hard we try to stop you, you will continue to make a fool of yourself by jumping on every anti monarchist outburst, no matter how remote it is to the crown.
Hi John, thanks for your view point. What we can deduce from today’s exchanges is that I take personal insults far better than most on the forum…. Thinking about it… it is the one thing me and Charlie do have in common :lol:

Keep smiling :)

User avatar

Mervyn and Trish
Commodore
Commodore
Posts: 17014
Joined: February 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Mervyn and Trish »

Onelife wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 12:22
From Lidia Thorpe’s prospective and that of her ancestors she represents I can fully understand why she used this opportunity to highlight the injustices of which her people were subjected to at the hands of our colonial aspirations…mass killings, children taken away from of their parents, their traditional lands taken from them, their cultural identity denied.
And yet you can't see that the middle east situation is largely driven by similar actions inflicted on the Palestinians by the Israelis over decades.

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Onelife »

Mervyn and Trish wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 17:39
Onelife wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 12:22
From Lidia Thorpe’s prospective and that of her ancestors she represents I can fully understand why she used this opportunity to highlight the injustices of which her people were subjected to at the hands of our colonial aspirations…mass killings, children taken away from of their parents, their traditional lands taken from them, their cultural identity denied.
And yet you can't see that the middle east situation is largely driven by similar actions inflicted on the Palestinians by the Israelis over decades.
As far as I understand things the indigenous people of Australia were no threat to those who invaded their country…Hamas terrorists and a large proportion of Gaza’s population supported Hamas in their attempt to eradicate Israelis peoples.

There will be no peace in the Middle East while Hamas is in power, but I do agree with you in that innocent Palestinians are paying a very heavy price for what eventually will be an uneasy peace.

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Onelife »

towny44 wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 16:13
Onelife, you may well despise the Monarchy but no matter what Charles or Camilla say or do is going to make the Australian government hand over the running of their country to the less than 4% aboriginal population. But I gues that no matter how hard we try to stop you, you will continue to make a fool of yourself by jumping on every anti monarchist outburst, no matter how remote it is to the crown.
Hi John, just for clarification…from what I’ve been reading the Aboriginal peoples treaty to which they are seeking has nothing to do with 4% of Aboriginal peoples wanting to run Australia…. but don’t worry about making a fool of yourself as when you’ve done it a few times as I have you learn how to turn it to your advantage.

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by towny44 »

Onelife wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 22:01
towny44 wrote: 21 Oct 2024, 16:13
Onelife, you may well despise the Monarchy but no matter what Charles or Camilla say or do is going to make the Australian government hand over the running of their country to the less than 4% aboriginal population. But I gues that no matter how hard we try to stop you, you will continue to make a fool of yourself by jumping on every anti monarchist outburst, no matter how remote it is to the crown.
Hi John, just for clarification…from what I’ve been reading the Aboriginal peoples treaty to which they are seeking has nothing to do with 4% of Aboriginal peoples wanting to run Australia…. but don’t worry about making a fool of yourself as when you’ve done it a few times as I have you learn how to turn it to your advantage.
I had no knowledge of what the abo's were wanting, since like you I could not be bothered to search it out. I was merely making an extreme point to emphasises the futility of the senators outburst.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Onelife »

I actually did understand the Aboriginals peoples plight but chose not to highlight your lack of understanding in a way that would embarrass you.

Which I suppose is the difference between us, me being all heart, :angel: you being your normal self.

User avatar

barney
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 5852
Joined: March 2013
Location: Instow Devon

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by barney »

At what point do the colonists stop remaining British?
First generation, definitely British.
Second generation, debatable.
Third generation, 100% Australian.
So why blame the current British monarch?
Blame their own government.
Free and Accepted

User avatar

Topic author
Onelife
Captain
Captain
Posts: 14152
Joined: January 2013

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by Onelife »

Hi Barney, I think this article gives a good insight as to where the blame lies...

https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2018/04/04 ... -genocide/

User avatar

oldbluefox
Ex Team Member
Posts: 12524
Joined: January 2013
Location: Cumbria

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by oldbluefox »

It's in the far past and that's where it belongs. History is about learning from past mistakes. I can't be doing with those who dig up our past and start applying modern day practices to put it right. It's an impossible task.
I was taught to be cautious

User avatar

towny44
Deputy Captain
Deputy Captain
Posts: 9668
Joined: January 2013
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Not Our King

Unread post by towny44 »

Onelife wrote: 22 Oct 2024, 11:48
I actually did understand the Aboriginals peoples plight but chose not to highlight your lack of understanding in a way that would embarrass you.

Which I suppose is the difference between us, me being all heart, :angel: you being your normal self.
Your infant pomposity never fails to amaze me, keep it up please your role as forum jester suits you perfectly.
John

Trainee Pensioner since 2000

Return to “General Chat”